My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE120715
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE120715
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:21 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 8:41:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
NH1 TAB 17 PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The elongate geometry of the pit affects the shape of the overburden drawdown contours at <br />• short distances; at greater distances, the contours are circular, as if the pit itself <br />were circular. <br />The overburden drawdown contours do not intersect any of the boundaries, therefore no <br />impact to the San Miguel River from drawdown in the deeper part of the overburden is <br />predicted. Shallow aquifer flow into Tuttle and Calamity Draws in the vt cinity of the pit <br />will be decreased, but will be offset by pumpage from the pit. <br />The drawdown for the coal simulation was 8.0 ft during year 1, 5.8 ft during year 2, 6.0 <br />ft during year 3, 7.3 ft during year 4, and 8.0 ft during year 5. The resulting coal <br />drawdowns after each year are shown in Figures 17-9 through 17-13. Some boundary effects <br />are evident on the coal drawdown plots as the drawdown eventually intercepted all four <br />boundaries, including the San Miguel River. <br />Table 17-4 presents the simulated annual inflow for the overburden and coal simulations. <br />The greatest inflow is during the fifth year, when the pit is the deepest. These rates <br /> represent an average for the year. The simulated rates are greater in the beginning of <br /> each simulation year because of the instantaneously imposed change in pit depth. Because <br /> the pit will not be instantaneously deepened, the average rates are more realistic than <br />the slightly higher peak rates. <br />During the last time step of each year, little change in water levels occurred in the <br />simulations. The approximate steady-state nature also can be seen by comparing the inflow <br />rates for the first two years (Table 17-4). These rates are very similar. <br />Attachment 16-1, Tab 16 and, in particular, Table 10 within Attachment 16-1 address the <br />ground and surface water rights in the immediate vicinity of the Nucla and Nucla East <br />mining areas that could potentially be affected by pit inflow drawdowns. The <br />water-righted wells are completed in deeper aquifer units and should not be significantly <br />affected by pit induced drawdowns in the overburden. Peabody will attempt to secure <br />permission to monitor water levels in righted wells W-9 and W-41 (the two shallowest <br />completions) and is proposing to install up to five overburden piezometers in the <br />immediate vicinity of the Nucla East mining area to help insure that the drawdown <br />projections are reasonably accurate and that the local water rights are protected. <br />i Impacts to the local ground water users should be insignificant. Should the proposed <br />17-20 Revised 04/11/88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.