My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE120668
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE120668
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:18 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 8:39:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981016
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Main permit narrative
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It is anticipated that surface runoff in intermittent drainage channels <br />will have little effect on underground workings. Experience gained in oper- <br />ating this mine has shown that the only noticeable effect between surface <br />runoff and underground workings occurs when a fracture system is encountered. <br />When underground workings encounter such a system, the water contained therein <br />creates difficult mining conditions. However, these conditions tend to dry in <br />about two weeks. It should be noted that little or no alluvium is present in <br />the intermittent channels of this area. WSC has not observed significant in- <br />flows of water on a seasonal basis elsewhere on the mining property. Compar- <br />isons of water quality from two drill holes were made to estimate effect upon <br />the water quality from mixing of waters from above and below the coal seams. <br />The results illustrate groundwater quality in the immediate vicinity of where <br />mine wastes would be placed. Samples were taken from the No. 1 drill hole and <br />from seep water from above the coal seam, and subsequent comparison with water <br />• from No. 5 drill hole, which included water from all lower seams (Figure II.A.I). <br />These analyses are listed in Table III.C-2. Sampling was done 15 June 1979. <br />From the values in Table III.C-2 it can be assumed that the two waters <br />were very similar and, therefore, mixing of these two waters would cause no <br />appreciable harm. The most significant difference was in suspended solids, <br />72 mg/1 for No. 1 drill hole and 1,110 mg/1 for No. 5. This is probably be- <br />cause the sample from drill hole No. 5 was standing water in an open drill <br />hole, whereas the No. 1 sample was water which had been seeping through rock <br />and had most of the suspended solids filtered out. <br />Further hydrologic studies are anticipated for the permit area. These <br />studies will continue to monitor ground and surface water characteristics <br />relevant to the permit area and mining operations. <br />• <br />35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.