Laserfiche WebLink
M03107GE <br />~ • proposed Coal Processing Facility site is located adjacent to the <br />northeast of the coal stockpile pad and northwest of the mine <br />engineering office. A project vicinity map is presented on Figure <br />1. <br />2.2 Site Conditions <br />The proposed Coal Processing Facility site slopes down to the <br />south at an inclination of about three (3) to four (4) to one (1). <br />The proposed processing facility site contains a cover of juniper <br />and pinion trees. An existing power line crosses the proposed site <br />near the center of the site and is oriented northwest to southeast. <br />An existing haul road is located along the south edge of the <br />proposed site. <br />2.3 Subsurface Conditions <br />The subsurface exploration consisted of observing, describing and <br />sampling the soil materials encountered in three (3) auger advanced <br />test borings. The approximate locations of the test borings are <br />shown on Figure 2. The site conditions restricted the location and <br />number of test borings. The logs describing the soil materials <br />encountered in the test borings are presented in Appendix A. , <br />The soil materials encountered in the test borings consisted <br />generally of silty and sandy clay with cobbles and boulders. The <br />• silty and sandy clay soils tested have a moderate swell potential <br />when wetted and may consolidate under moderate loading conditions. <br />No formational material was encountered in the test borings to a <br />depth of about thirty (30) feet, the maximum depth explored. Auger <br />refusal on cobbles and boulder material was encountered in the test <br />borings at depths of about fifteen (15) to thirty (30) feet. <br />No free subsurface water was encountered in the test borings at <br />the time of our field study. We anticipate that the free sub- <br />surface water elevation may fluctuate with seasonal and other <br />varying conditions. <br />It is difficult to predict if unexpected subsurface conditions <br />will be encountered during construction. Since such conditions may <br />be found, we suggest that. the owner and the contractor make provi- <br />sions in their budget and construction schedule to accommodate <br />unexpected subsurface conditions. <br />u <br />3 <br />Lambert anD ~,o~s'oeiates <br />CONSULTING GEOTECN NICAL ENGINEERS ANO <br />MATERIAL TESTING <br />