Laserfiche WebLink
6.5- Geotechnical Stability Exhibit <br />Methodology <br />SB-Slope, v. 3.0 {Von Gunten Engineering Software, Inc.) is the slope stability <br />application utilized for this application. The program uses the "Simplified Bishop <br />Method of Slices" based on the limiting equilibrium circular failure surface method as <br />developed by A.W. Bishop (1955). <br />The program was used to predict the factor of safety for a given setback from the mine <br />excavation where the factor of safety is defined as: <br />Z(available shear strength)/T~(required shear strength) = Factor of Safety (FS) <br />For each setback analyzed, the critical failure surface was determined. <br />Data Input <br />Model input data is based on test hole boring data. Soil strength data is based on <br />published values and data provided by the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology. <br />Table 6.5.1 -Soil Strength Parameter data <br />Soil Density Cohesion <br />Number Stratigraphic Layer (pfc) (psf) Phi (~) <br />1 Overburden (ML) 90 3.6 34 <br />2 Unsaturated Gravel 130 0 35 <br /> (GW-UNSAT) <br /> Saturated Gravel <br />3 <br />(GW-SAT) 137 0 35 <br />4 Weathered Shale 142 0 14 <br />5 Shale 150 500 25 <br />The mine slope was divided into three different sections: east, southwest and northwest <br />mine slopes. For each section, the stratigraphic layer thickness was determined by <br />averaging the nearest test holes. Soil thickness information is shown in Appendix I. <br />The model input phreatic surface was determined by the following analytical solutions. <br />The Theis method was used for approximating drawdown at distances greater than 100 <br />ft. Dupuit-Forsheimer solution was used for approximating the drawdown geometry <br />(phreatic surface) close to the seepage face. <br />The mine slope was set to 0.5 to 1. <br />Model Output <br />The model output information is shown in Appendix I. The minimum setback and critical <br />surface factor of safety are shown below. <br />