My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE119955
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE119955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:18:53 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 7:59:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997054
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/19/1998
From
DMG
To
MIKE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.- - • <br />~ iii iiiiiiiiuiiiiii, <br />RECEIVED <br />FE8 1 ~ 9S98 <br />Division of Minerals 8 Geology <br />Mr. Michael B. Long <br />Division of Minerals <br />Department of Natural <br />1313 Sherman St, Roo <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Mike, <br />and Geology <br />Resources <br />m 215 <br />February 17, 1998 <br />Thank you for taking the time to discuss some of the environmental <br />concerns with the proposed Agile Stone System Parkdale Project (112 <br />Permit application, M-97-054). As we indicated, Ciean Water <br />Action, and Colorado Trout Unlimited remain concerned over the <br />projects potential impacts on both water quality and water <br />quantity. Unless the following issues are adequately addressed by <br />Agile, we believe that the project ought not to be permitted. <br />It is our understanding that there may be a substantial amount of <br />pyrite in the area. If it is true that metallic sulfides are <br />present in the rock and soil, then the potential for acid <br />generation from these materials would require considerable pre- <br />project analysis of baseline conditions, detailed assurances that <br />acid generation would not result in any adverse impacts to local <br />surface and ground waters, and reclamation bonding requirements to <br />cover any mitigation and/or control structures required ~o meet <br />state and federal water quality requirements. Although under the <br />Construction Materials Rules such an operation would not be <br />specifically classified as a Designated Mining Operation as under <br />the Minerals Rules, the Division is still obligated to prevent acid <br />mine drainage and protect water quality from construction material <br />mines in a similar fashion. <br />Under Construction Rules 3 and 6, the applicant cannot receive a <br />permit until it ass~.tres the Division/Bo4rd that "ail refuse and <br />acid-forming or toxic producing materials... shall be handled and <br />disposed of in a manner that will... protect the drainage system <br />from pollution." 3.1.5, see also 34-32.5-116(4); Rule 6.3.3. <br />without an analysis of the potential for such materials to create <br />such conditions, an applicant cannot meet these requirements. Due <br />to the likelihood that drainage from the project area will reach <br />both surface and ground water, detailed water quality protection <br />plans for these resources must be forthcoming from the applicant <br />prior to permitting. It should be noted that these requirements <br />are mandatory if there is a potential for any acid or toxic-forming <br />materials to occur on site--they do not become mandatory only if <br />such formation is likely. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.