My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE119947
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE119947
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:18:52 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 7:58:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997089
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/17/1998
Doc Name
STONE GRAVEL PIT SECTION 112 APPLICATION M97-089 PUBLIC COMMENT PROVIDED FOR RECONSIDERATION
From
TRAVIS E STILLS
To
DMG
Section_Exhibit Name
SECTION 112
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Bureau of Land iv4anagctncnt <br />San Juan Resotuce Arca <br />Federal Building 701 Camino Del Rio <br />Durango, CO 81101 <br />Attn: Clyde Johnson <br />Dear Clyde: <br />--c <br />EXHIEIT S <br />STOP ]E CRUSHING <br />2;500 County Road P <br />Doior~5,co sI>>3 RECE~VF~ <br />1'rov 12 1991 <br />Bureau of Land tifanagemem <br />Durengo, Colorado <br />T}•is letter is in response to the concerns chat you had about the Stone gravel pit. After meeting with <br />you and Kirk at the sate on November 5, IS97 you zsked me to put in a letter what we discussed. <br />I. Y'ou recomerded fencing 3. acres of the pit & kr_pin3 all roads open to travel. After mrtirg with <br />you and Kirk i[ was aced that I could inst_II a controlled acess sate on the South road <br />leadinz to the pit site, which would give me [he security I need and still give access to rand ;.;520 for <br />the public to use. No ocher fencing should be needed until reclamation begins. <br />?. You recomendzd a plan For ro opus wetd controll. I also a¢ree that weeds would need to be controlled <br />and I would agrr. to spray once or twice a year as needed. In talking with Kirk, he thought the BL~f could <br />assist me initally with this problem because o; the weeds tha: already edst on the site. <br />3. You recomended that the acess road leading to the site be constructed to County specifications. In our <br />meetinn at the site it was a?rr..d to all that I could could use a "pit run" base to stabilize the read and <br />use smaller ¢ravel for the drivinst wrface. <br />4. You .var,ted no tap soil to be used in cons;rucion of roads or other site work. I would agrr. to this. <br />5. You recomended idcr.ti;,ng and fencing the possible archaeolovicaJ site in the Southwest comer of the <br />propem~. ?,[ our mr_tirg at the site on November 5, IS97 Cristie with the BL~I flaged out the perimeter <br />of the area being studied and agreed to have it Fenced as so as possPole to protect it. I will prctr_-t that area <br />Fom any minin¢, but I have no control over public acess. I also would allow any acess to the BL~f to the <br />site after mining begins. <br />if this satines your concrns please contact hL-. Thomas Giifis of the Division of ~(iner als & Geology and <br />inform him so. <br />I ank ynu for yotu cooperation, <br />.~~~%lv/~i" ri <br />Doren Ston <br /> <br />Receive <br />DEC 2 6 197 <br />z <br />5 <br />.`_ - <br />.~. <br />~_~. <br />a <br />~.._~: <br />~.~:, <br />4..:. <br />w. <br />.~ ~ <br />ti <br />i <br />i <br />a <br />Durango Fail cric. <br />Division of tAlns; a~J 4 csclcgy <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.