Laserfiche WebLink
2. .Srnro SnmTlinv -There are no state sampling results available jor this facility. <br />V. TER>tiIS AND CONDITIONS OF PER4IIT <br />A. Determination of Effluent Limitatiors <br />1. Fjfj gent I ;miratintt_c • The jollowing limitations jor outjall 00l will apply and are discussed in Section V.B. <br />i • <br />Table V-1- Ef(luettt Limitations for Ouifalls 001 <br /> Limitation <br />Parameter: 30-Day 7-Day Dailybfaximum Rationale <br />... Average Average <br />Flow, MGD Report NIA Report Design Capacity <br />Total SuspendedSofids,mg/L 30 45 N/A WaterQualiryStandards <br />Total Dissolved Solids, mglL Report N/.4 Report State Salinity Regulatior. <br />Oil and Grease, mg/L N/A N/.4 !0 State Effluent Regulntiw <br />pH, s. u. N/A N/,4 6.5-9.0 Water Quality Standards <br />Total Recoverable Arsenic,mglL Report N/A 54.327 WaterQuallryStandards <br />Potentially Dissolved Cadmium, mg/L 3.570 N/A 6.61 Water Quality Standards <br />Potentially Dissolved Trivalent Chromium, mg/L 126.864 NfA 712.3(8 Water Quality Standards <br />Potentially Dissolved Hesavafent Chromium, mg/L 8.356 N/~f 8.869 Water Quality Standard; <br />Potentially Dissolved Copper, mg/L 15.194 N/A /8.294 Water Quality Standard; <br />Potentially Dissolved Lead, mg/L 5.546 N/A /03.660 ~T'ater Quality Standards <br />Total Recoverable Mercury, mg/L 0.0076 N/A Report Water Quality Standards <br />Potentially Dissolved Nickel, mg/L 9!.487 N/A 601.736 Water Quality Standards <br />Potentially Dissolved Selenium, mg/L 1.067 N/A 8.207 Water QualityStandnrds <br />Potentially Dissolved Silver, mg/L 1.367 N/A 6.098 Water Qtra[iry Standard; <br />Potentially Dissolved Zinc, mg/L Report N/A /50.779 Water Quality Standards <br />Benzene, mg/L 53.63b NIA Report WarerQZ,alttyStandards <br />Naphthalene,rng/L 470.993 N/A Report WaterQuafirySrandard; <br />Whole Effluent Toxicity, Acute NfA N/A LCro> 100% Stare Permit Regulatio^s <br />2. Discussion ojEj,+l:rent Limitations <br />a. RQgulnrinns far Ffllnant~r. I imira?tnn_c: 7be Regulations for Efliuenl Limitations (Regedat'or. i/o. 62), apply W ;: <br />conventional pollutants. Far this facility, the /imitation jor Oil cad Crease is based on this regulation. <br />b. AT nlirnhly Federal Fffh~enr Cuidohnac and .Ganda>d~: ~~/o federal guidelines have been promulgated jor this n~ <br />of facility and none are expected However, the contaminant; found due to groundwater pumping at this foci:: <br />have been indicated to be a result ojthe off-site groundwater impacu from the former oil refinery and should , <br />least be mentioned in this permit. The oil refinery had Federal Guidelines that applied ro this type ojfaciliry. Tr.e <br />can be cited from 40 CFR Part 419.22 (BPT effluent lirnitations guidelines), 419.23 (BATj, and 419.24 (BCT} jc <br />the Petroleum Refining Point Source Category (Parr 419/, Cracking Subcategor,• (Stt6part B). The guidelines ar, <br />standards, which would apply, include the jollowing parameters; Total Suspended Solids, BODs, COD, Dil ar <br />Crease, Phenolic Compounds, Total Ammonia os N, Total Sulfide as HS, Total Chromium, and Heravele; <br />Chromium. <br /> <br />