Laserfiche WebLink
30 <br />• record at this point. If this assumption turns out to be correct, this will be one of the first places <br />where the systematic exploitation of these particular resources has been documented in the region. <br />In addition to the general research program described by MclCibbin et al. (1997:Chapter 3), a more <br />tailored research design is appropriate for evaluating and treating the cultural resources of the <br />landscape. The first priority will be to establish whether pinon nuts and acorns were the focus of <br />activity. This will be pursued through palynological and macrobotanical analyses of artifacts and <br />features. Second, archaeological expectations for evidence ofprocurement, processing, storage and <br />use of pinon nuts and atoms can be generated from the ethnographic record. This provides some <br />guidance for interpretation of sites, features and artifacts that have been and will continue to be <br />discovered as investigations proceed. Finally, broader artifact and feature analyses and inter- and <br />intrasite comparisons can be used to help place this particular activity within a larger framework of <br />hunter-gatherer settlement and subsistence, using Binford's forager-collector model (1980) and <br />through comparison with other regional studies. <br />Table 4 Summary statistics for artifact class occurrence <br />Artifact counts: <br /> chipped stone ground <br /> debitage tools stone <br />number of sites 105 105 l05 <br />minimum 0 0 0 <br />maximum 3100 42 56 <br />average 94.3 4.9 5.5 <br />median l6 3 3 <br />Artifact class ratios: <br /> debitage: <br />ground stone debitage:chipped <br />stone tools ground stone: <br />chipped stone tools <br />number of sites" 84 97 81 <br />minimum .I2 .25 .12 <br />maximum 775.00 516.67 8.00 <br />average 27.4 18.23 1.44 <br />median 5.25 6.00 1.00 <br />• sites are included only if they have artifacts from both artifact classes in the ratio <br />Pinon Nut and Acorn Procurement and Processine <br />The ethnographic record for the Great Basin and California is rife with reference to the use <br />of pinon nuts (and other pine nuts) and atoms for subsistence (see numerous accounts in Thomas <br />[1986], D'Azevedo (1986], and [Heizer 1978]). Ethnographic information for non-Puebloan <br />. populations in the local region is somewhat limited, though several Apache bands' ethnographies <br />are published (Ortiz 1983). Agave appears to have been the staple vegetable resource for the <br />Apache, though most bands also procured pinon nuts and acorns (Basso 1983; Opler 1983a, 19836; <br />