My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE119879
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE119879
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:18:50 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 7:49:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997089
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/19/1997
Doc Name
FAX COVER
From
STONE GRAVEL PIT
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• What are the PM Eftecte • oncern7 • <br />• The characteristics, sources, end potential health effects of larger or "coazse" fraction particles <br />-• (from 2.5 to 10 micrometers in diameter) and smaller or "fine" particles (smaller than 2.5 <br />micrometers in diameter) are very different. <br />• Coarse particles come from sources such as windblown dust from the desert or <br />ngricuhural 5elds and dust kicked up on unpaved roads by vehicle traffic. <br />• I~ine particles are generally emitted from activities such as industrial end residential <br />combustion and front vehicle exhaust. Fine particles aze also formed in the atmosphere <br />wlicn gases such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and volatile organic compounds, <br />emitted by combustion activities, aze trarufontted by chemical reactions in the air. <br />- Coarse particles can accumulate in the respiratory system and aggravate health problems such <br />as asthma. EPA's scientific review concluded that fine particles, which penetrate deeply into the <br />lungs, are more likely than coarse particles to contribute to the health effects (e.g., premature <br />mortality and hospital admissions) found in a number of recently published community <br />epidemiological studies at concentrations that extend well below those allowed by the current <br />PMto standards. <br />• These recent community studies find that adverse public health effects are associated with <br />exposure to particles at levels well below the previous PM standards for both short-term (liom <br />less than 1 day to up to 5 days) and long-term (from generally a year to several years) periods. <br />• These heahh effects include premature death and increased hospital admissions and <br />~ emergency room visits (pritrtarily the elderly and individuals with cardiopulmonary <br />disease); increased respiratory symptoms and disease (children and individuals with <br />cazdiopulmonary disease such as asthma); decreased lung function (particularly in <br />children and individuals with esthtna); and alterations in lung tissue and sttvetttre and in <br />EPA's Revised Particulate Matter Standards Page 4 of 6 <br />respvatory tract defense rrtecharristns. <br />• EPA believes that the new standards will protect and improve the Gves of millions of <br />Americans. <br />• EPA's final rules, in addition to regional haze rules, address the so-called "welfare" effects from <br />particles for which the previous PMtp secondary standards did not provide adequate <br />protection. Chief among those is visibility impairment. Fine particulate matter adversely <br />impacts visibility because i[ scatters and absorbs light. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.