My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE119801
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE119801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:18:48 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 7:42:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000113
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/5/2001
Doc Name
MAMM CREEK SAND & GRAVEL PIT HYDROLOGIC ADEQUACY REVIEW COMMENTS FILE NO M-2000-113
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
;- -; <br />~II II~II~II~IIII ~I~ <br />~- <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Revaurces <br />I31 3 Sherman SL, Room 215 <br />DIVISION OF <br />Deriver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone. qU3) 866-3567 MINERAL S <br />FA\: (303) 832-8106 $c <br />GEOLOGY <br />Date: March 5, 001 RECLAMATION <br />`~ MINING•SAFETY <br />To : Gregg Squire, Allen Sorenson, Carl Mount coy°~~,' <br />~~ GceR E. Walther <br />From : Tom Schreiner E.eculive Dueclor <br />M¢hae18 Long <br />Division Director <br />RE :Mamm Creek Sand & Gravel Pit -Hydrologic Adequacy Review Comments <br />File No. M-2000-113 <br />I have reviewed the February 21, 2001 adequacy responses for the "Mamm Creek" Regualar 112 <br />Application. The following adequacy concerns remain outstanding and will need to be addressed <br />to the satisfaction of the Division prior to a recommendation of approval. <br />RULE 6.4.4 EXHIBIT D - Minint= Plan <br />1. The applicant has specified that a copy of the design specifications for bedding and filter <br />material to be used for the various barrier configurations as shown on Exhibit CS-2 will be <br />submitted to DMG for their review and approval prior to construction. The Division is in <br />agreement with this commitment. The applicant/operator should be appraised that such <br />information will need to be submitted in the form of a Technical Revision. <br />2. The applicant has specified that the operator intends on constructing a weir on the discharge <br />end of the Renewable Resource Area (RRA) during runoff and to keep out low flows during <br />mining. It is imperative that the applicant clarify how the weir will be constructed, provide the <br />construction costs, provide a plan view and representative cross sectional design, and discuss the <br />permitting requirements for such a weir as required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. <br />3. The applicant has specified that the operator is currently performing a 100-year floodplain <br />study for the RRA and the areas immediately upstream and downstream from the RRA. In order <br />to evaluate the potential for offsite impacts due to Hooding during mining and reclamation, the <br />applicant must provide a detailed assessment of the possible impacts expected during a "worst <br />case" flooding event along with any necessary mitigation measures to be employed. Such an <br />assessment will need to be reviewed and approved by the Division prior to any site disturbance. <br />(The assessment may be submitted as a technical revision to [he permit if not available at the <br />time of the Division's recommended decision date. In [his scenario, the applicant will need to <br />commit to submittal of such information as a technical revision for review and approval prior to <br />site disturbance). The intent of the assessment should be to predict or assess any impacts to the <br />river channel both within the permit area and the upstream and downstream areas during flooding <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.