Laserfiche WebLink
Limited-Results • aeological Survey Form (page 3 of <br />III. LITERATURE REVIEW (continued) <br />25. Known Cultural Resources <br />In the project area: none <br />In the general region (summarize): As stated in No. 24. Both ~nP~ t;th;r a,,,t rnr4 eheltar <br />sites recorded along river to south. <br />26. Expected Results: Nothing possibly an IF or two <br />VI. STATEMIIVT OF OBJECTIVES <br />27 Find out whats there and avoid if significant, Standard Reasons to do any survey. <br />VII. FIELD METHODS <br />28. Definitions: Site not applicable since no site. <br />IF single obiect without anv assocatied materials. <br />29. Describe Survey Method: parallel transects spaced no greater than 15 meters apart within <br />pit/ zig zag transects up one site of existing road and returning the other for access rd. <br />covering a 15 meter wide swath on each pass. <br />VTII. RESULTS <br />30. List 1Fs if applicable. Indicate IF locations on the map completed for Part III. <br />A. Smithsonian Number: 5MN46s1 <br />B. Smithsonian Number: <br />C. Smithsonian Number: <br />D. Smithsonian Number: <br />DCSCIlptlon: frag if sugar quatzite knife (base) See Fib 4) <br />Description: <br />Description: <br />Description: <br />31. Using your professional knowledge of the region, why are there none or very limited <br />cultural remains in the project area? Is there subsurface potential? <br />