My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE119279
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE119279
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:15:01 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 6:48:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984065
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
3.3 Hydrology and Geology
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
these same units (Snowmass Coal-CMLRD Permit Application, 1982) and <br />support this flow direction. This flow direction will be confirmed <br />in the permit area by wells drilled from within the mine. The <br />similarity in water quality between the Rollins sandstone and <br />Wheeler coal (Figure 3.3-12 and Appendix 3.3-6) suggests that these <br />units may be partially connected through fractures. Since the <br />Wheeler gradient is most likely to the south, the Rollins gradient <br />is most likely very similar. <br />• <br />• <br />With potentiometric heads of 6040 and 6080 feet, for the Rollins <br />sandstone and Wheeler coal, respectively, discharge to the north <br />would be expected where the elevation of the surface outcrop traces <br />are below these elevations. This situation occurs west of hole <br />SK-3H (Figure 3.3-6), but surface discharge has not been identified <br />in these areas. Any ground water which potentially discharges <br />along this portion of the outcrops may be evapotranspired and/or <br />discharged directly into the colluvium and is never seen as free <br />surface water. Due to the low permeability of these units, only <br />small amounts of water would be expected to discharge along this <br />stretch. Another possible source of discharge may be as steam in <br />the coal burn areas. Steam has been observed along the Wheeler <br />burns and may explain why liquid water is not seen at the surface <br />in an area below the observed water surface elevation, <br />Water pressure data collected from SK-3H suggests that this is a <br />recharge area for the Wheeler and Rollins, and probably the Upper <br />and Middle sandstones. Pressures are consistently higher in the <br />Wheeler than in the deeper Rollins, suggesting downward movement. <br />Also, the water-quality of these units is quite good compared to <br />many water-bearing carbonaceous and coal lithologies. The low <br />overall total dissolved solids may be due to relatively short <br />contact time with the rocks, as would be expected in a recharge <br />area. <br />NCSC - Coal Ridge #1 <br />3-31 <br />7-BC/1145/900301 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.