Laserfiche WebLink
GOI 7Ut/LUGJ lO: YI~ <br />a road as is now proposed, and that Mr. Gray really intends only to get a permit now, with some <br />access t can not be co tested on tres asslgrounds; with thetntent to later switch access to the <br />' ' ' Ro d location(s~after the pe t is in place. It is our concern that once a permit is <br />appro d, s ch a change of access ma not require the same notice to third parties and the same <br />level of scru my an~ othgr requirements of tl~ie MLRB. <br />Therefore, in order to avoid what we believe could be a backdoor way to seek approval of the <br />prior applica 'on, my client would respectfully request that the current permit not be anted <br />unless an ad uate plan leer detailing the road specifications and estimated costs thereof have <br />i been subtnitt d, and prof ofequate funds to build the same in place; and we would also <br />suggest that y approval be c early conditioned upon construction of that specific mad within a <br />certain time ame, and that if such road is not so constructed, or if such mad is later abandoned <br />j for another r d location, that express term of the permit be that the current penuriit ends and <br />~ that a new permit needs to be i 'tiered from the start. <br />By copy of this le r I ad sing Mr, usher, who is Mr. Gray's attorney, and Mr. Scanlon, <br />who filed the A.ppl~catio~i on behalf of Mr~ay, of this objection. <br />I I ~ <br />j Cc Vic Rous az <br />i Tizn Sc lon <br />Clie$rt <br />Very truly yours, <br />Rob J. Thomas <br />K <br />