Laserfiche WebLink
Stream Channel Parameters <br />Exhibit 55 and Changes Due to Mining-Induced Subsidence Page 4 <br />the yield estimate of 160 acre-feet per square mile per year based on the U.S. Geological Survey <br />(USGS) regional regression equations (USGS 1985). <br />The 1936 through 1947 and 1985 through 1993 periods of gaging flow on Minnesota Creek show <br />an average annual yield for 41.3 square miles of 420 acre-feet per square mile. <br />For the purpose of annual average sediment yields for the subject basins, WWE and Mr. <br />Pemberton have concluded that an appropriate (i.e., conservative) mean annual runoff for the <br />subject basins of 475 acre-feet per year should be adopted, even though site-specific data for the <br />basins would likely indicate a mean annual runoff of less than 475 acre-feet per year per square <br />mile. The adopted value represents a high mean annual runoff for use in conservative sediment <br />and channel stability studies. For water rights purposes, the average year yield estimate of 200 <br />acre-feet per year is suitable, as approved by the Colorado Water Court in 1986. <br />• Peak Runoff Rates <br />Peak rates of storm runoff from rainfall and snowmelt events were defined for three return <br />frequencies: 2-, 10-, and 100-yeaz events. <br />These discharges are based on statistical evaluation of peak daily flow data collected by MCC in <br />the permit area since 1978, study of the long-term published records for the North Fork at <br />Somerset, and statistical evaluation of published streamflow data for basins in the vicinity of the <br />West Elk Mine. Special evaluations were made of the Lick Creek. Sylvester Gulch. and Horse <br />Creek basins using the USGS peak rate of runoff computational procedure applicable to small <br />basins in the Colorado mountainous area (USGS 1980. <br />Figure 2provides asemi-logarithmic plot of the peak discharge rates. The semi-logarithmic <br />plotting technique was adopted [o analyze the small tributary basins under consideration. It is <br />consistent with the regional analyses for the North Fork. <br />n <br />U <br />