My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE118814
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE118814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:14:31 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 5:57:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 25 Bear 1 & 2 Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• choice, the reclaimed areas would qualify for bond release. For cover, the total <br />herbaceous cover mean of 39.8% dearly exceeds 36.0%. Table 9 demonstrates that <br />the 35.7% perennial, non-noxious cover mean is also equivalent to the target standard <br />with 90% statistical confidence. For herbaceous production, both the total and the total <br />perennial, nun-noxious values of 2414 and 2294 pounds per acre respectively exceed <br />the target value of 1440. <br />Table 4 shows that no species exceeds the 60% relative cover cutoff value. <br />Seven species contribute greater than 3% relative cover. Four are caul season grasses <br />(E[ymus truc'hycuulis, Lophopyrum clongutunt, Puscapyrum smithir, and Pou prutensis), <br />two are perennial ti~rbs (Astrugulus cicer and Eucephulus glaucus), and one is the <br />biennial forb Me[itotus ofjicinutis. Combined, the six perennial species add up to less <br />than 80% cover, the maximum allowable value for hre species. Therefore, the cover <br />• data indicates that the site has exceeded the species diversity success requirements. <br />Sample Adequacy Calculations: <br />On August 11, all cover vansects were sampled. Sample adequacy for those <br />transacts was calculated to be 17.0. Therefore, since the number of transacts sampled <br />(19) exceeds the calculated sample adequacy value, the mine area can he considered to <br />have been adequately sampled for this parameter. Table 7 summarizes the calculation <br />of the cover sample adeyuacy value. <br />Between August 12 and 14, 120 production plots were clipped. These samples <br />were allowed to air-dry for a week and were then weighed in order [u allow a <br />preliminary calculation of sample adequacy. The sample adeyuacy value t<~r the 120 <br />samples was 152.0, requiring that additional production samples he collected. On <br />August 19, the site was again 'visited, with an additional 35 samples being collected in <br />• order to satisfy sample adeyuacy requirements. The preliminary sample adeyuacy <br />value calculated for the combined 155 samples was 131.4, indicating that adeyuacy had <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.