PERMFILE118708

• Permit No: M1997032
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 7/6/1999
• Doc Name: VAN 4 SHAFT FN M-97-032 REQUEST FOR 4TH EXTENSION OF DECISION DATE APPROVED
• From: DMG
• To: INTERNATIONAL URANIUM CORP
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE ~ CO~v~~ ,` ~
DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY
Department of Natural Resources
1 J13 Sherman SL, Room 215
Denver, Colorado 8020]
Phone: [phone]
FA%:(303)83?-8106 ~;,•.c(~,E~VED
June 3Q 1999 JUL 0 6 1999
Michelle R. Rehnlamt „ ., pt ldinl:rals 8 G@OIOtf/
International Uranittm (USA) Corp.
Independence Plaza -Ste. 950
1050 SeventeenW St.
Denver CO 80265
~E'~~E~ IC
1=~ EL~C ~~ ~ C~Py
SITE; ~ ' ?z
~rl~~/ "`h trY l't
~~
DIVISION OF
MINERALS
G EO LOG1~
RECLAMATION
MIN ING•SAFETY
BJI Owcns
Wvemor
Greg E bValcher
Erecvovr Director
Michael B Long
Division Due~br
Re: Van 4 Shaft, File No. M-97-032, Request for Fourth Extension of Decision Date: Approved.
Dear Ms. Rehmann,
I have received a faxed letter from you, dated 6/30/99, consisting of the fourth request for an extension for tlteabove-named
application. Tomorrow was [o be Ute decision date for this appltcation, a date by which all required materials were to Have
been submitted, reviewed and found to be satisfactory and adequate for the requirements of this pemtit. I did receive a packet
of materials submitted by you mvvard completing this requirement, but there is no[ sufficient time far their review. Your latest
request asks for an exTension of the decision date until August 1, 1999. I am approving this request, and the decision date is
now set for 8/1/99.
As you are aware, if the requirements are not met by the decision date, the application may be denied. Therefore, please ensure
that all responses to Ote Division's 11/18/98 adequacy review letter and onsi[e inspection report of I/l3/99 are submitted with
enough time for them to be reviewed, and if necessary request further clarification from yon. If the new date cannot be met,
you [nay consider requesting another extension.
Please be aware drat, pursuant to Rule L4.2(3), if a[ the end of 365 days after the submittal date of the application, there are
still outstattding adequacy issues [o be addressed, dte decision on 01e application will be [Wade by the Mined Land Reclamation
Board during a hewing to be scheduled. Tltat 365-day period ends on 11/3/99.
As you requested in your letter, I have called and left a voice mail message approving this extension request.
I have received tvvo recent packets ofapplication-related materials front you, consisting of proofs of additiotal filings with ilte
Montrose Count}• Clerk and Recorder's office. Sutce this application is still in its active review stage, please continue to
ettsttre that all materials pertinent to the application, including your requests for extension and my responses, are being placed
for public review at the county clerk and recorder's. Please also ensure that such addilioniil filings are made in a timely
manner. By the tune of the Division's decision, you will have [011ave provided proof of each and all such additional filings.
Please contact me S }'ou have any questions. I may be reached a[ the Division's Durattgo field office: 484 Turner Dr., Bldg.
F-101, Durango CO 81301; tel [phone] or fax 970/247-S 104.
Sincerely,
~i)~ ~~/~
Bob Oswald
Em~ironmental Protection Specialist
fax copy: Roger Smith, IUC, Dove Creek
Vicki Hoffsetz, IUC, Dem-cr (a:\van4 ext4 appr/rco)