Laserfiche WebLink
~VltS tlt°-C'~i~A/( ©~ 'fi~.2 p~~-eGTronS ~~©..l L.aZ~~r- <br />w as re/~s~ 6y ~S. LaLea.r 52~ .Co.,?~„« leer <br />Fro»c; Frances P.Lazear/ r2cewe.~l, 12-o8-a~~s' <br />20508 Brimstone Rd SSS . <br />Cedazedge, co alal3 DEC 0 7 <br />November 27, 2005 <br />Tv : D~-t G .~ <br />RE'~r'wr.~tG~ <br />CCOMMEN'l'S ON BENSON BROTHERS <br />± ..~, pc~,~,~ <br />L~x~r~ „f ~~..~ a dn. <br />RECLAMATION <br />I-t~E: /Yl-1oo~S-v7i ri <br />As a homeowner living approximately 1/2 <br />proposed red shale pit in Coalby Canyon, I wish <br />operation. I wish to be made a party to the pro ee <br />and would like for a nre-hearin¢conferenc to be <br />prehearing conference include a <br />schedule a hearing on the applic <br />the hearing in Delta or Grand Ju <br />SHALE PIT) <br />from the boundary of the <br />°~~. <br />~~ <br />°n'6 ~`FO <br />o state my strenous objections to thf~a~ <br />ding, I wish to be on the mailing list, ''ayr <br />held in Cedazedge. Please have the ceo~o~ <br />which all parties aze included. Please <br />e reasons stated in this protest, and set <br />convenient to the proposed project site <br />There aze a number o slea ng statements in the application, and important <br />points are left out all gethe I wil oint these out in the document below where the <br />applicant's statements~aze i not ,and my comments follow. <br />GEOLOGIC <br />Exhibit D- Minin an~ <br />Applic do ontains an analysis of the southern slope by Ute Engineering Co. It <br />only addresses sl a above the cliffs. The stability of the Rollins Cliffs which border <br />the southe d of e property has not been addressed. The cliffs contain many fractures <br />and nc f re ent large rockfalls abounds. Vibrations from the operation may loosen <br />mor e i of sandstone. There aze three residences immediately below these cliffs. <br />An an s should be done by a company which has experience in cliff stabiliTy prior to <br />conside ti of this permit. Operation of the crusher and lazge equipment on the north <br />side o the ridge may transmit vibrations through the ground sufficient to dislodge rocks, <br />eve hen operations are not occuring neaz the top of the ridge. (34-32.5-116(4)(1) & 34- <br />32. -115(4)(a)) <br />Although I feel risk to adjoining property from the above mentioned geologic <br />hazards should be sufficient to deny the permit, if the permit is accepted I feel the <br />following restrictions should be placed on the operation: <br />1. Preferably no rock crushing should be allowed on the premises. Low frequency <br />vibrations transmitted through the ground pose unacceptable risk of cliff failure with <br />