My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE118473
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE118473
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:14:10 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 5:17:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 09 USFS ANIMAL-UNIT CLASSIFICATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COJDi'IC'; !'LASS SCGRECAF.D <br />The presence or absence of grass and grass-like plants is a much <br />stronger indication of relative condition than the occurrence of <br />weed or browse species. Likewise, grass and grass-like plants <br />furnish the bulk of the forage and exert the greatest influence in <br />maintaining site conditions favorable tp maximum production. <br />Therefore, for our purposes in using this scorecard, it is necessary <br />to consider the occurrence of crass and crass-like species as the <br />basis for judging range condition. Ordinarily the better forb and <br />browse species will be present in the good and excellent conditions <br />and will be replaced by less desirable species in the lower condition <br />classes. <br />CO'IDITION STANDARDS <br />Determine the range condition class by evaluating both the vegetation <br />and the soil stability. Whichever rating is the lower determines the <br />overall condition class for the type or site- <br />VEGETATION CO!IDITION CLASS <br />The vegetation condition class is obtained in two steps: (1) by rating <br />"forage density and composition," and (2) by rating "vigor." <br />Determine the "forage density and composition rating" directly from <br />the number .of transect hits on foraoe plants (DESIRABLES AND INTER- <br />MEDIATES). .However, in order to qualify or rate in the excellent er <br />good classes, a certain number of the forage hits must be on DESIRABLES. <br />Forage Hits Per Transect <br />Ratin <br />Over 45 (30 or more hits must be on DESIRABLES) Excellent <br />36-45 (15 or more hits must be on DESIRABLES) Good <br />26-35 Fair <br />13-25 Poor <br />0-12 Very Poor <br />The relative position within the class (i.e. high, medium or low) <br />will be determined by the relative number of forage hits. For <br />exzmple, 27.forage hits per transect would rate low fair (fair-). <br />Vigor <br />The above rating must be adjusted according to the vieor,.which is <br />rated.bv comparing averzee maximum heicht or leaf length of 10 <br />ungrazed plants with locally developed standards for optimum vigor. <br />• <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.