My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE118436
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE118436
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:14:08 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 5:14:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 05 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT 4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lorrncrro Canyon lfrne Conmur Gas Culnva(Resources Inventory <br />• 5LA9566 <br />This site is a single feature located on a small finger ridge at the south edge of asouth-facing <br />bench overlooking Jeff Canyon. The feature is possibly an eagle trap or vision quest structure <br />and is similar to those found on sites SLA9561, SLA9571, and SLA9572. This feature consists of <br />an oval dug-out depression with tabular sandstone around the perimeter of the depression. The <br />feature measures 3.5 x 3 meters, outside dimensions, and 2 x .75 meters, inside dimension. The <br />center of the feature is 40-45 cm deep. The feature appears to be disturbed. The dug-out area in <br />the center could be historic disturbance of the feature. Another possibility is that the digging <br />represents prehistoric construction to retrieve sandstone slabs for the perimeter and to clear the <br />center; the feature was perhaps not completed. The site is not significant as an archaeological <br />resource. It is possible that these structures (i.e., eagle traps) may retain spiritual or cultural <br />significance for the Native Americans who formerly occupied the area. Consultation is required <br />to assess this potential. The feature does not have the integrity of other similar structures and is <br />considered not eligible for the NRHP unless the Native Americans consider these structures to be <br />significant traditional cultural properties. The site also would not be a contributing member of <br />the proposed LCRHL because it represents activities other than those relating to the main theme <br />of the district. <br />5LA9567 <br />This site is located on a small raised knoll on asouth-facing bench overlooking Jeff Canyon. The <br />artifacts are on the knoll and down the west slope. The site measure 34 x 13 meters and consists <br />of 39 tertiary felsite flakes, two pieces of felsite shatter, and one broken ground stone artifact of <br />quartzite. The site represents a small knapping station. The possibility of buried cultural remains <br />is low considering the shallow depth of soil over bedrock and the abundance of gravel and slab <br />sandstone on the surface. The site is considered not eligible for the NRHP. The site is unlikely to <br />contribute to the proposed LCRHL. There is only one fragment of ground stone artifact is <br />present, thus there is little to support the main theme of the district which is the processing of <br />pinon nuts and atoms. Secondly, the paucity of artifacts does not provide sufficient basis for <br />information on site function other than lithic reduction which does not contribute to the directly <br />to the district's theme. <br />5LA9570 <br />This site is located on an east-facing bench just to the north of a small unnamed drainage that <br />flows east into Lorencito Canyon. The site is a 52 x 43 meter scatter of chipped stone and ground <br />stone artifacts. The observed artifacts were in blow-outs and erosional areas along the toe of the <br />bench. It is likely that buried cultural deposits exists. There were no rodent burrows or drainage <br />cuts to assess potential depth of soil deposition. Artifacts observed included 32 pieces of felsite <br />flakes and shatter representing all stages of lithic reduction. There were two basalt tertiary flakes <br />and one piece of basalt shatter. Additionally, there is one felsite chopper bifacially worked, two <br />felsite retouched flakes, three felsite biface fragments, one basalt scrapper bifacially worked, and <br />four ground stone artifacts. Testing is recommended to assess potential for intact buried cultural <br />• deposits and to determine eligibility for the NRHP. The site is considered a contributing resource <br />C'umnnKSmGi/Rer-RPT(J'S1Rrv//dpril: ". :00/ to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.