PERMFILE118135

• Permit No: M1992060
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 9/4/1992
• Doc Name: LAGOON PIT FN M-92-060 ADEQUACY REVIEW OF PERMIT APPLICATION
• From: CITY OF MONTE VISTA
• To: MLRD
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

~ STAT*O
MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION
Department of Natural Resources
7373 Sherman SI.. Room 275
Denver. CO 80203
303 866-3567
Fax: 303 832-Bt06
September 11, 1'92
Mr. Joe Kurys
Public Works Direc c
City of Monte Vista
720 1st Avenue
Monte Vista, CO 811
Re: Lagoon Pit (File
September 9, 1992
Dear Mr. Kurys:
COLORADO
pF' 00~
~~~~>
«~ip y$
•~NC'~~r
~m~r' r
+BRa
M-92-060) Revie'.v of Adequacy Responses dated
I have reviewed the above re
following adequacy concerns.
Application form
rented response and continue to
The Division's concern about he
City does not intend to affect
110(2) permit. The size of the
since what is outlined on the Ex
the 17 acres indicated on page 1
permitted acreage.
amount of affected area is
reth n 10 acres which qua
ermi area, however, still
ibi` E mans as the permit
~f he application form a<.
Roy Romer,
Gwemor
Michael B. long,
Division Director
ve the
addressed; the
lilies it for a
remains a concern
area does not total
the amount of
The applicant must r25olve the dif e.ences in the acreage values given for the
permit area which appear en page of the application form and the acreage
value apparent for the tract out fined n the Exhibit E maps. .4 revised page
should be provided if the tract ndicat d on Exhibit E maps is all that is to
be included in the permit area.
Notices
Ycur response included evid nce of the publi aticn in the M nt2 Vista Journal
of the notice of filing of he permi. aoplica ion on May 13, 1992. Apparently
a copy of the aoDiicaticn as also received Ma 14, 1992 b, the Rio Grande
Ccunty Clerk'; or-ice. T e application first =ceived by the Division on
.;une 2. 1992, however. co sited of oniv the first page of the application form
and •:+as indicated to be incomplete by the Divisi n in its letter to ~rou dated
June i6, 1992. in -hat letter, vcu ~:re re dd'/i5ed hdt d CO Dlet? 3pp11Cdi10n
was necessary and that if you had already initidte public lion, you ~.vould need
to republish in conjur lion Faith the submittal of a complete application as
scecified in Rule 3.2 ?)(b>(iii). The Division did of re eive wnat it
considered to be a ce cl2te applica_ion until .4ugust 4, 1992.
Evioence of publi~.at cn of the notice of filing on or a~ter the receipt of the
ccmo~ete applicdtio by the Division should be supplied d a 10 day period for
comment followin0 t at publication da-e should be specirie to that notice.
Evioence of riling a complete apDlica`.icn with the Ric Gran e Coun*_v Clerk's
off ire on o, af`e -ne .august le, 199? date should also be supplied