Laserfiche WebLink
<br />15. Quantity of topsoil has been systematically side-stepped by applicant. <br />16. I do not believe that a commercial building can remain on [he property upon reclamation, since <br />it is not zoned commercial by Fremont County. <br />17. Proof of adequate water is only shown for [he firs[ 4 years - no[ for the life of the mine which is <br />rated at 50 years. <br />18. Applicant has avoided a commitment to salvaging all topsoil possible and has no[ committed to <br />reclaiming any specific amount of land. <br />19. Any conswction involving the wetlands area of Tallahassee Creek must take place during the <br />colder winter months to avoid the disastrous results that would occur during the flash flooding <br />that warm weather brings. <br />20. My husband's adjudicated spring can be considered a well. If high sediment wash water is <br />dumped into the applicants gravel pit it will without doubt, adversely affect his well. <br />2l. Storm water going over the crossing structure proposed by the applicant would wash it out and <br />i[ would be carried into the Arkansas River if water goes over the [op of [i. <br />22. The 200 foot right-of-way the applicant is referring to is actually a railroad easement that is <br />measured from the center of the tracks 100 feet to each side of the tracks. My husband's fence <br />is a ground surveyed fence line [hat is 100 fee[ from the railroad [rack center line. The <br />applicant's fence line lies 50 feet into the rail road easement. <br />23. I am concerned [hat Agile submitted to testing schedule or specific pollution criteria for their <br />well monitoring. (Unclear) <br />24. I atn worried about possible ground contamination from the refueling and possible over filling <br />of the gas tanks on their mobile equipment. <br />25. If high sediment wash water is dumped into the applicant's gravel pit, added turbidity in my <br />spring will be caused by the gravel pit operation. <br />26. In the original version, the application proposed three separate phases of reclamation. The <br />authors now call for reclamation only after all mining operation have been completed. <br />27. The new application has substantially changed from the original permit application submitted to <br />your division. Agile Stone Systems should have to go through the entire process of an original <br />permit application.... <br />28. The hydrology information submitted to the Division is not correct according to our current <br />research. <br />29. The increased size would have an adverse affect which has no[ been studied in enough depth. <br />