My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-12-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2001-12-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2017 9:22:59 AM
Creation date
11/25/2007 4:32:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 15 CSU REVEGETATION STUDY 1979-1981
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
z7 <br />• '~ Biomass data collected in the 1979 growing season is not consistent <br />with the cover data and other characterizers of the vegetation. It <br />is believed that the sample size for biomass data collection must be <br />increased in order to minimize the variance encountered in the treatments <br />sampled. <br />Species Evaluation Plot <br />The purpose of this plot is to identify the best grasses, fortis, and <br />shrubs adapted to the waste material at this site. Many species not <br />appearing in the `fain Plot seed mixture are seeded here to permit the <br />investigation of a wider selection of plant materials. Because of the <br />nature of the plot, the plants are subject-only to intraspecific competi- <br /> tion for moisture and nutrients. Intraspecific competition is often <br />• ~ more severe than interspecific competition, because plants of the same <br />species seeded together have very similar moisture and nutrition require- <br />ments. A complete test of a species' success will require the interspeci- <br />fic competition of growing in a mixture of species. Table S contains the <br />species rated goad to excellent in vigor and survival. <br />Slope Plots <br />The most obvious difference between the two sets of slope plots was <br />the lack of vege*_ation on the steeper 1.5:1 plat. The 3:1 plots support <br />a much mare vigorous growth of seeded species. Examination of the steeper <br />1.5:1 slope plot has shown that the absence of vegetation appears to be <br />the result of erosion beneath the mulching materials and also the higher <br />heat load the steeper slope accumulates. The slack material beneath the <br />. ~ mulch is extremely erodible when placed at a grade this acute. The 1.5:1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.