Laserfiche WebLink
• material was taken from waste materials by the conveyor at the portal. A Red <br />Dog sample was collected approximately 15 feet south of the existing diesel <br />storage tank. Bench material from the white Raton Sandstone was taken from <br />the area to the southeast of the portal near the sump. Two Bench Fill <br />samples were taken to the south of the sump on the exposed bench pads. The <br />analytical methods used in the laboratory analysis and the 1988 sampling <br />results are presented in Exhibit 1, Results of Laboratory Analyses. <br />DATA INTERPRETATION <br />Due to the absence of published Colorado suitability guidelines, the <br />overburden data were compared using the suitability criteria found in the <br />1984 Wyoming Topsoil and Overburden Guideline (Wyoming DEQ 1984). <br />Specifically, the suitability rankings found in Table I-2, Criteria to <br />Establish Suitability of Topsoil (or Topsoil Substitutes), and Table I-4, <br />Criteria to Establish Overburden Suitability were used. The New Mexico <br />Mining and Minerals Division's 1987 Overburden and Soils Guidelines were also <br />consulted in this evaluation (New Mexico MMD 1987). In this reference, the <br />ratings proposed in Table C, Soil and Soil Substitute Suitability Ratings, <br />and Table D, Potential Root Zone Overburden Suitability Ratings, were <br />consulted. Given the CMLRD's past reliance on the Wyoming Guidelines, <br />preference will be given to this document. In the following evaluation each <br />sample parameter suggested in the Colorado Guidelines will be discussed using <br />the appropriate suitability ranking found in these two references to <br />determine the suitability of these materials as potential cover soil media. <br />• For the parameters in the Colorado Guidelines that do not have suitability <br />criteria listed in either the Wyoming or New Mexico Guidelines, the technical <br />publications of Schafer (1979) and Sutton et. al. (1981) were consulted. <br />Since these sources list slightly different suspect levels, the lowest <br />suspect level for a given parameter was used. <br />SAMPLING RESULTS <br />Soil Reaction (pH). The Wyoming Guidelines define topsoil substitute <br />materials as having a "suitable" ranking when the pH values range between 5.5 <br />and 8.5. The pH values for the Raton Creek Mine overburden and bench <br />materials ranged from 5.6 to 7.8 with a weighted mean pN value of 7.05, <br />meaning that all of these 24 observations fall within the "suitable" range <br />with respect to soil reaction. This means that no potential problems appear <br />to be associated with these materials with respect to their soil reaction. <br />Electrical Conductivity (EC). The Wyoming Guidelines define topsoil <br />substitute materials as having a "suitable" ranking when all of the EC values <br />are less than 8 mmhos/cm. The EC values for the Raton Creek Mine overburden <br />and bench materials range from 0.32 to 4.65 with a weighted mean value of <br />0.74 mmhos/cm. All of the 24 observations were found to correspond to the <br />"suitable" category. One observation had a value exceeding 4 mmhos/cm. This <br />bench sample material was white Raton Sandstone material that had been <br />deposited at the time the mine closed in 1984. Elevated salinity levels were <br />not expected for this material due to its sandy texture, and it is believed <br />that because of exposure to water and salts while inside the mine that these <br />salinity values are somewhat elevated. These conditions are indicative of <br />• contaminated conditions. Due to the mixing that will occur when these bench <br />materials are used for reclamation and the salt tolerance of native plants, <br />this one excursion above the suspect level should not pose any concerns <br />regarding ultimate reclamation success. On a volumetric basis all of these <br />materials would fall within the "suitable" category once the .mixing <br />