Laserfiche WebLink
-6- <br />i <br />• 2. The surface of the proposed waste embankment area should be <br />graded to develop a low zone which will perform as a sump in <br />the center of the disposal area. Moisture which collects on <br />the refuse will flow rapidly through the relatively permeable <br />refuse and collect on:the surface of~the hard bedrock which <br />will occur throughout the disposal area. <br />3. A gravel drain system should be constructed in the sump area. <br />We anticipate the sump area to consist of a site approximately <br />100 feet in diameter about 2 to 3 feet below the surrounding <br />area. The entire surrounding disposal area should drain toward <br />the .sump. All existing sand and gravel should be stripped <br />to provide a direct impermeable barrier below the entire disposal <br />site. <br />4. An 6-inch perforated drain pipe, constructed with either clay <br />drain pipe, open-joint tile, or a durable plastic drain material, <br />should be installed from the bottom of the sump and should lead <br />in a southerly direction to a point of discharge in the area of <br />the existing sediment pond. The drain line should be bedded in <br />coarse, washed gravel. The entire sump area should be backfilled <br />with the clean, on-site sands and gravels. <br />• 5. After the sump area has been constructed, the refuse should be <br />deposited in dump piles by truck methods. On a periodic basis <br />' the piles should be spread in approximately horizontal layers, <br />rolled and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum dry <br />density determined using AASHTO Method T-99. The presently planned <br />rate of production indicates that approximately 1.7 feet of <br />fill will be developed during the early years of use. As time pro- <br />gresses and the refuse pile increases in height, the surface area <br />will reduce and the increase in height will be such that 2 to 2.5 <br />feet of fill may be produced on an annual basis. <br />6. In order to meet the requirements for compaction, we suggest that <br />the refuse be piled in piles and compacted on approximately a 6-month <br />basis. This will preclude the passibility of developing excessively <br />thick layers for compaction. At the time of compaction, it will .~ <br />be relatively simple to make density tests to determine compliance <br />with the required density. This would result in an inspection of <br />the pile approximately each 6 months of operation. <br />7. No samples of the materials for construction of the pile were <br />available at the time of this investigation. We have conducted <br />analyses of stability of numerous waste disposal areas for large <br />mine wastes constructed out of the overburden materials in the <br />• surrounding areas. Based on these investigations, as well as <br />observation of performance of waste piles, indicates that the <br />t. <br />