2002-05-13_PERMIT FILE - C1980004A

Home Browse Search

• the greatest potential for campsites (i.e. ridgetops and canyon bottoms) were selected. It should be noted that portions of the areas surveyed for this project had been previously surveyed by Hibbets et al. (1979) and by Grand River Institute personnel during the past few years but, because of some confusion over exact acreag>; previously surveyed, surveyors rewalked several areas. Figure 3 outlines those areas within the project bound- ary which .were surveyed during the current study, areas previously surveyed within the project boundary, and the overlap of the two. On page 24, paragraph 2 should read: Figure 4 outlines the project area and identifies the loca- tions of the three archaeological sites and ene suspect area re- corded during the survey. It is our opinion that all portions of the project area which may have been conducive to prehistoric and/or historic occupation were subjected to a 100 percent pedes- trian survey. The probability of locating other significant cul- tural resources within the project boundary is considered to be less than 5 percent. 5. The following should be added to the section entitled REFERENCES • on pp. 28-32. Borland, Lois 1952 Ho for the reservation; settlement of the Western Slope. Colorado Magazine 29 (1): 56-75. Buckles, Wiiiiam G. 1968 Archaeology in Colorado: historic tribes. South- western Lore 34 (3): 53-67. Goodykoontz, Colin B. 1927 Settlement in Colorado, in History of Colorado, edited by James H. Baker and LeRoy H. Hagen. State Historical Society of Colorado, Denver. Hafen, LeRoy R. 1948 Colorado and its People, Vol. 1. Lewis Historical Publishing Co., Inc., New York. Haskell, Charles lJ. 1886 History and Description of Mesa County, Colorado. Edited and published by the Mesa County Democrat, Grand Junction. Rait, Mary 1932 History of the Grand Valley. M.A. thesis, Univer- sity of Colorado, Boulder.