EXPLANATION ; ' , -'
<br />V
<br />225 %� 226 �) °o- - --
<br />,, - - -- ` -_ - --
<br />0 , "
<br />�'
<br />- --- -. Y oft '
<br />tD t ,
<br />;' o
<br />13 MAP UNIT NUMBER
<br />-- "
<br />rouse Spring
<br />U.S. FOREST SERVICE 1997 SOIL UNIt KEY
<br />225
<br />200 Rock outcrop i
<br />o
<br />229 1;
<br />230
<br />FOREST
<br />SERVICE BOUNDARY
<br />' 207 Boralfs and Borolls, clayey, slumped, 5 to/65 percent slopes
<br />\
<br />\. 21 Torriorthents, Warm - Rock outcrop complex, 35 to 90 percent slopes
<br />213 Hayrack - Muggins - Nutras complex, 40 to 65 percent slopes
<br />4e
<br />0.
<br />222 \ Wetopa - Wesdy complex, 5 to 65 percent slopes
<br />�y' X7610 1- j
<br />226
<br />225 Herm - Fughes complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes
<br />226 Herrin Fughes - Kolob family complex, 25 to 40 percent slopes
<br />229 Cryocrepts , Cryoborolls - Rubble land complex, 15 to 90 percent slopes
<br />230 Haploborolls - Ustocrepts - Rock outcrop complex, 40 to 99 percent slopes
<br />229
<br />i\ 236 Shawa - Sandia family - Kolob family complex, 5 - 40 percent slopes
<br />A \\
<br />`.� 237 Shawa - Sandia family, K'blob family complex, 40 to 65 percent slopes
<br />24 Coberly - Falcon, dry complex, 0 -15 percent slopes
<br />W
<br />o
<br />W
<br />290 1 Godding -- Kolob family " - Delson complex, 5 to 25 percent slopes, very stony
<br />..;%
<br />\� 291,, Godding - Kolob family - Delson complex, 254o 65 percent slopes,
<br />\
<br />\'`
<br />-----------------------
<br />293 `Leroux - Seitz complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes
<br />'
<br />`- 302 -Cumulic Haploborols, 1 to 3 percent slopes
<br />` \325 Broat \Canyon - Scout family complex, 25 to 65 percent slopes
<br />'`,\
<br />226 229
<br />(C(n::):)0
<br />225
<br />360L Nutras `Tellura complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes
<br />'\f �—
<br />oh><
<br />Iron j
<br />Point
<br />,, i�, A T I O N A L
<br />`. O
<br />R E S
<br />o
<br />Ak
<br />230
<br />error reek
<br />— - -- -- - _
<br />X 8 313
<br />Zeservoi
<br />;
<br />6 o
<br />'
<br />�o
<br />WC
<br />i
<br />Tf'>
<br />I� Bull
<br />- }
<br />8200
<br />Park �` - 237
<br />I 229
<br />1
<br />\ `\
<br />'t1 X 8615 \'� 8. w6 DERAL
<br />COAL LE,�SE COC 61209
<br />O
<br />225 W
<br />82
<br />6 '' j
<br />LU
<br />I 210 w
<br />onwood i
<br />i ?800
<br />I W
<br />t amp
<br />o
<br />......I
<br />`.
<br />\
<br />vv O o
<br />`V �> o
<br />-, '��
<br />I
<br />/61() 230 I
<br />225
<br />' -
<br />1
<br />\ NOTE: 2,?,�
<br />,
<br />�� �°
<br />I i
<br />SOILS INFOMATION IS TAKEN FROM TWO SOIL SURVEYS
<br />I
<br />' 4110
<br />/
<br />COMPLETED FOR THE PROJECT AREA. AN ORDER III SOIL . - _ __
<br />SURVEY, ENTITLED SOIL SURVEY OF GRAND MESA -WEST
<br />\ I 229
<br />2361 ,I'
<br />i ELK AREA (CRYER AND HUGHES, 1997) WAS USED TO \ �'
<br />237
<br />/
<br />I
<br />CHARACTERIZE AND DESCRIBE THE SOILS OVERLYING \
<br />210
<br />THAT PORTION OF THE AREAS ADMINISTERED BY THE
<br />A SOIL SURVEY COMPLETED BY THE Nt
<br />362
<br />FOREST SERVICE.
<br />/ )_
<br />NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
<br />(FORMERLY THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE), ENTITLED >> ,\ . J
<br />ed On Mine Plan
<br />� 210 ,
<br />SOIL SURVEY OF PAONIA AREA, COLORADO (HUNTER, 1981) �+ sldence
<br />of Sub
<br />\
<br />210
<br />/
<br />1 WAS USED TO CHARACTERIZE THE SOILS OVERLYING THE Extent
<br />PRIVATELY HELD AND BLM- ADMINISTERED LANDS WITHIN / 1 / 1
<br />`
<br />THE AREA. THESE TWO SOIL SURVEYS WERE NOT ,. 290
<br />/ 1 CORRELATED, AND THE MAP UNIT BOUNDARIES DO NOT
<br />`\
<br />NECESSARILY MEET. '
<br />225
<br />-
<br />�,
<br />I /c8023 �� �'�
<br />290
<br />I
<br />`
<br />Spr6c e II ;�� 291
<br />237
<br />229 l
<br />y ;
<br />229 822
<br />Storrlp I> �� 'i \
<br />,
<br />00
<br />6'
<br />t\ yj Boa - - - - --
<br />240 ,
<br />' \\ 210 ;
<br />J�
<br />_ - - --
<br />o 6
<br />01 1 /
<br />O
<br />'
<br />291
<br />a
<br />226 ;
<br />J
<br />226
<br />226
<br />o h qA
<br />270 I f 729
<br />226
<br />FOREST SERVICE BOL.IkDA Y 7921
<br />%
<br />orral
<br />�
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I/
<br />/'600 X%912 )rn
<br />�
<br />\
<br />� �. ,Blue Ribb�lr�
<br />° \, ,' Mine
<br />,
<br />/
<br />` ( Q
<br />(` '
<br />I\
<br />i
<br />1 %
<br />\ \
<br />1 3
<br />I
<br />000
<br />1
<br />�- 1 �e
<br />X 19]:1
<br />75 -- 36'
<br />75////
<br />- 13
<br />FEDERAL COAL LE SE%C 61209 I;
<br />-�—
<br />2
<br />75
<br />r—
<br />-----------
<br />- "- --� - -- -- - --
<br />-- - 1
<br />39 ,
<br />1 13
<br />�1
<br />-
<br />0 1 2
<br />L --
<br />1
<br />O NEW
<br />VFNT
<br />eel/ / PRJ SITEI I\
<br /><,-
<br />!
<br />- -- ' -- -- - - - - -- ''
<br />13
<br />( I
<br />v
<br />4
<br />38
<br />6009
<br />0 1
<br />_\
<br />t o '
<br />it
<br />� �
<br />-
<br />'•IF �\
<br />J /�
<br />\ 1 /
<br />18'2 —
<br />X
<br />I o
<br />75 l
<br />1
<br />13
<br />EXPLANATION '"
<br />L�
<br />13 MAP UN1T1VUMBER
<br />\ I
<br />%A,
<br />( IJ r' ; 75�
<br />I
<br />NRCS 1981 SOIL UNIT KEY _—, ',
<br />75
<br />I
<br />75
<br />2
<br />Absarokee Work loarns; 6 to 25 per slope (n
<br />1 3
<br />`� �`\
<br />\\ Bow;e o. 2
<br />Mine ` \ '
<br />\1K
<br />12
<br />Beenom Absarokee looms, 5 to 20 percent slo es ,� I j r
<br />\
<br />e
<br />13
<br />Beenom` Absarokee association, 20 to 60 perc nt dopes `` 1
<br />12`'�
<br />\�
<br />I
<br />74 %
<br />36
<br />Fluvents, flooded E —�
<br />`' /
<br />%�� �
<br />� Mine I
<br />� Mine
<br />I
<br />38
<br />Fughes loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
<br />��` �-
<br />39
<br />Fughes loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes
<br />8?%
<br />9 Y P 4
<br />lercenOslopes rnt pes � Il
<br />ti� -
<br />�� 4'A\
<br />., 7
<br />' p00
<br />\
<br />42
<br />YP - -- --
<br />Gle ton fine sandtlloam, 0 t 3
<br />- - -_
<br />T
<br />45
<br />RMIT OUND
<br />1Haplaquolls, flooded
<br />62 ' , I 594Fa
<br />a °' - Juanita
<br />47
<br />Kech - Rock outcrop complex; 40IQ-40- percent slo s t}
<br />%//
<br />a 45 unit
<br />82'
<br />42
<br />60
<br />�\ Botts loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes ,` -,� I, �\
<br />" ^•��I Bowie 4' /
<br />/
<br />62
<br />Prqgresso loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes ��
<br />\5
<br />_ / 45
<br />�...�` 4
<br />38
<br />70
<br />Saroton -Agua Fria complex, 20 to 50 percent slop `�
<br />`�
<br />l
<br />436 .n. �D 45 - -- —
<br />74
<br />75
<br />I .) 1\ \
<br />I Torrlprthents - Haplargids complex, very stony
<br />\ Torg6rthents - R* outcrop, sandstone, complex
<br />\\ 6200
<br />74
<br />\
<br />- , 76 70
<br />R E 62 / 6p ,
<br />41
<br />76
<br />Toriorthents - Roo outcrop, shale, complex
<br />45 45 3Q
<br />U
<br />\
<br />82
<br />Work loam, 6 to '12 percent slopes 1 -• 3
<br />;
<br />PROJECT:
<br />BOWIE NO. 2 MINE
<br />PREPARED FOR:
<br />BOWIE RESOURCES LTD.
<br />D
<br />N
<br />W E
<br />ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
<br />l hereb dart j��hot this drawing was done
<br />N
<br />5
<br />TR -47 Hubbard Creek Vent Shaft; Permit Boundary Modification
<br />LK.B.
<br />07116107
<br />TITLE:
<br />4
<br />PR -09 Permit Boundary Modification
<br />T.K.B.
<br />09/30/05
<br />3
<br />TR -31 Permit Boundary
<br />L.K.J.
<br />02/25/04
<br />PPRovEf
<br />RE,
<br />SOILS - NRCS /USES
<br />D BOWIE NO. 2 MINE
<br />P.O. BOX 483
<br />PAONIA, COLORADO 81428
<br />S
<br />by r�®0BSgef;' direct supervi__ <,on
<br />t 7a of t(p i motion resented
<br />wing , "' and correct to
<br />and
<br />on
<br />the
<br />o
<br />2.
<br />REVISED PERMIT BOUNDARY, EXTENT OF SUBSIDENCE PER PR04 ADEQUACY
<br />D.A.J.
<br />02119/01
<br />I 7 ,, �
<br />BOWIE RESOURCES, LTD.
<br />,S�,e'
<br />v
<br />bggs� -�of r� kn ire e and belie,.
<br />/
<br />1.
<br />REVISED PER PR04 ADEQUACY, ITEM 25(D)
<br />D.A.J.
<br />01117101
<br />_ PREPARED BY: J. E. STOVER & ASSOCIATES
<br />_- -- _ -_ P.O. Box 80340
<br />-- Grend Jct., CO 81508
<br />No.
<br />DESCRPPTION:
<br />BY
<br />DATE
<br />ONE INCH I
<br />t r tT --
<br />++ ; vc�- i� 8'
<br />L ,
<br />Jolsaes E. Stover „ Dot5
<br />DWG. NAME:
<br />_ y
<br />DMG I.D. No. C - 96 - 083
<br />DESIGNED:
<br />D.A.J.
<br />01/17101
<br />REFERENCES
<br />DRAWN:
<br />MAP 4A
<br />-_ --
<br />- - — __�__-
<br />�6�Od0 P.E. 19230
<br />SCALE: ill = 1000
<br />- _ -
<br />CHECKED:
<br />
|