Laserfiche WebLink
Table a.7~(canclud ed) • <br />Evaluation of Soll Reconstruction Material <br />Munger Canyon Mlne <br /> <br /> <br />Series <br />Sample <br />Point <br />Depth <br />(In) <br /> <br />SAR <br /> <br />Salinity Tox lc <br />Matarlals° <br />(f)oron) <br />Soll <br />Reaction <br />Available <br />Water Cap <br />Erosion <br />Factor Wlndb <br />Erodlblllty <br />Group <br />USDA <br />Texture <br />Coarsed <br />Frogs <br />Overall <br />Rating <br />Nln lilt MC3 0-7 good good good good good good good good good GOOD <br /> 7-16 good good good good good good good good good GOOD <br /> 16-30 good good good good good good good good fair GOOD-FAIR <br /> 30-37 good good good good good-fair good good good felt GOOD-FAIR <br /> 37-71+ good good good good good tair fair good good GOOD-FAIR <br />Rivra Mll7 0-6 good good good good good fair fair good good GOOD-FAIR <br />variant 6-14 good good good fair good-fair fair fair good good FAIR <br /> 14-60 poor good good poor poor fair fair good good POOR <br />Ren isac HUB 0-9 good good good good good good good good good GOOD <br /> 9-20 good good good good good good good good fair GOOD-FAIR <br />N <br />~ aevaluatlon based on Wyaoing DEQ Guldel lne No. 3 for boron Ilm its <br />bfran Textural analysis and SCS rind erodlblllty groups (USU1 SCS, 1974) <br />csemple taken of McCl one Canyon Mlne <br />dfran Held description of coarse fragments <br />eevaluated based on textural analysts, saturation percentage, and field description of coarse fragments according to USFS (1974). <br />