My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE116126
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE116126
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:12:02 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:46:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1995019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/19/1995
Doc Name
MUNDELL ESTATE 32 PIT FILE M-95-019 2ND ADEQUACY LETTER
From
DMG
To
BACA CNTY BOARD OF CNTY COMMISSIONERS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
x_ <br />• III IIIIIIIIIIIII III • <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources I~~~ <br />1313 Sherman Si., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 13031 A66-3567 <br />FAX. 1303) 832-8106 <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />April 19, 1995 cOVefna' <br />lames S. Lochhead <br />Executive DireUOr <br />Mr. Ray Miller, County Commissioner <br />Baca Count Board of Count Commissioners Mic hael B. LOnR <br />Y Y Division Dveaor <br />P.O, Box 116 <br />Springfield, CO 81073 <br />RE: Mundell Estate No. 32 Pit (File M-95-019) 2nd Adequacy Letter <br />Dear Mr. Miller: <br />As a result of your FAX response dated April 14, 1995, the Division <br />understands that Baca County waives its right to a decision on the <br />above referenced application within 30 days of submittal, ie. by <br />April 13, 1995, and wishes to continue the Division's review. <br />Since the Fax response dated April 14, 1995 involves changes or <br />additions to the application, pursuant to Rule 1.8, this letter is <br />to notify the county that a new decision date of April 28 has been <br />established for the application in order that the following <br />documentation be provided: <br />1) Evidence, as required by Rule 1.8, that the changes or <br />additions made in the application by the FAX response were <br />also added to the copy of the application on file for public <br />review with the County Clerk and Recorder. <br />2) Evidence of the publication of notice of the application in <br />a newspaper of general circulation as required by Rule 1.6.2 <br />(1) (c). (A copy of the notice to be published was included in <br />the permit application, but evidence that it was published as <br />required has not been provided.) <br />3) A signed and notarized Performance Warranty, the need for <br />which was indicated in the Division's first adequacy review of <br />the application for the Mundell Estate No. 32 Pit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.