My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE116033
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE116033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:11:57 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:39:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2005071
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/3/2006
Doc Name
Geotechnical Stability
From
MVR Resource Inc.
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Impacts of Mechanical Equipment at Benson Brothers Quarry on Neazby Rock <br />In Colorado, where daily 40-degree temperature changes are not uncommon, differential <br />expansion of stone, especially in rock with southern exposure, creates strains that aze much <br />greater than the dynamic strains caused by ground motions with PPV intensities less than 0.048 <br />in/s. <br />It should also be noted that over long periods of time, forces caused by swelling ice when water <br />in vertical and near vertical rock joints and fractures freezes, causes rock wedging failures. <br />Physical evidence of the site clearly indicates that rock-spalling caused by freeze-thaw-cycles <br />and other normal weathering processes have been at work over time. <br />Several years ago, the author did a similaz vibration-effects study involving the effects of <br />vibrations caused by mechanical excavation equipment operating near steep rock bluffs adjacent <br />to residential homes in Castle Rock, CO. In that case (Revey, 2002) mechanical rock trenching <br />and back-hoe mounted hoe-rams would eventually operate within 200 feet of the near vertical <br />rock bluffs. Predicted maximum ground motion intensifies, based on actual site vibration <br />measurements were expected to approach 0.2 in/s, which is 4 times greater than the 0.048 in/s <br />motion intensities expected in this case. All excavation work was subsequently done without <br />incident. <br />4.0 CONCLUSIONS <br />Based on these findings and comparisons, it is reasonable to conclude that motions caused by <br />vibrations of operating quarry machinery at the proposed Red Shale Quarry will have no impact <br />whatsoever on the stability of rock slopes because they are virtually immeasurable and any <br />stresses that would occur are orders of magnitude less than the sffesses caused by natural <br />environmental stresses and forces and freeze-thaw cycles. Similarly, equipment-induced <br />vibrations caused in underground coal mine openings that may exist at greater distances below <br />neighboring homes will also be immeasurable and will have no impact on current ground <br />stability. <br />In light of the fact that rock falls have occurred in the Rollins sandstone bluff in the past, it is <br />very likely that the forces of nature will continue to causes erosion and rock falls within this <br />formation. When they might occur and to what degree is impossible to predict, but depending on <br />the in situ condition of the rock bluff, it can be concluded that when they do occur, they will be <br />caused by natural environmental forces and time they might occur will not be accelerated by <br />immeasurably low levels of ground vibration. <br />5.0 REFERENCES <br />Revey, G.F, (2005), Assessment of Blast-Induced Ground Motion at Homes Involved in: James <br />P. Melton III et al vs. Harrod Concrete & Stone Co. <br />Revey, G. F., (2002), Review and analysis of Ground Vibration Induced by a Trencher and Hoe- <br />ram at the Castlewood Canyon Residential Development Project. <br />REVEY Associates, Inc. Page 7 of 7 February 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.