Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Gregg Squire • • <br />Page 3 <br />December 20, 2000 <br />A barrier is proposed on the discharge or lower end of the renewable resource area to keep water <br />out of the area during mining and to control the flow out of the area during runoff. The design <br />concept is to use the width of the opening in the bank as the bottom width of the weir. The <br />bottom of the weir would have a 4% slope with the beginning elevation being high enough to <br />keep water out of the pits during mining. The flow capacity of this weir is shown on the attached <br />printout from Haestad Methods Flow Master. The details are shown on Exhibits C-3, C-4, CS-1, <br />and CS-2. <br />The estimated flow going through the overflow channel is will be provided at a later date. <br />The barriers will be located by surveying in the corners using the coordinates provided on Exhibits <br />C-3 and C-4. <br />The erosion protection area will be inspected annually during the low flow period and repaired as <br />needed prior to the next high Flow season associated with runoff. <br />Since the river is a dynamic system, channel alignments, flow depths, island configurations and <br />other features are constantly changing. It is expected that the river will capture the renewable <br />resource area one day because the runoff flows will be high enough to alter the channel. The <br />1982 topographic mapping used in the floodplain study shows a main channel of the river flowing <br />through the proposed renewable resource area. The Colorado River experienced higher than <br />normal flows during 1983 and 1984 that significantly altered the river channel alignment in the <br />project area. The main channel began to flow north of the island that contains the heron rookery <br />while the channel on the south side of the island became an overflow area. This overflow area is <br />the proposed renewable resource area. <br />Item 3 -Reclamation of the Renewable Resource Area if it is part of the main channel. If the <br />Renewable Resource Area becomes part of the channel, then an inspection will be performed with <br />DMG to see if the post-mining channel is functioning. The operator would stabilize the bank in <br />areas that the inspection identifies as unstable and requiring stabilization. A site specific plan <br />would be developed after the inspection based on the guidelines provided in the "In-Stream <br />Aggregate Extraction and Reclamation Guidance Document". If no bank areas are identified as <br />requiring stabilization, then there is no reclamation liability for the Renewable Resource Area. <br />Item 4 -Reclamation of the Renewable Resource Area if it is not part of the main channel. If the <br />Renewable Resource Area does not become part of the main river channel then this area will be <br />reclaimed as a backflow area. The assumed water surface elevation of the backflow area is <br />$333.00. The projected area of inflow is shown on Exhibits F-1 and F-2. The bank slopes will be <br />left on a 3: I slope by the mining operation. After mining is completed and the renewable resource <br />area is to be reclaimed, the 3:1 slopes left by mining will be prepared and seeded using the <br />approved seed mix. It is expected that willows and cottonwoods will naturally invade the area <br />thereby providing additional bank stabilization. See Cross Sections on Sheets CS-1 and CS-2 . <br />After the reclaimed area has had flows through it, the 3:1 slopes will be inspected to see if <br />additional stabilization is required beyond seeding with the approved seed mix. If any areas <br />