My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE115883
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE115883
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:11:49 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:28:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000028
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/23/2000
Doc Name
FERRERO PIT FILE M-2000-028 RESULTS OF DIVISION REVIEW OF APPLICANTS MARCH 21 2000 ADEQUACY RESPONSE
From
DMG
To
GREG LEWICKI AND ASSOCIATES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: ()03) 8663567 <br />FA%: 1303) 832-8106 <br />March 23, 2000 <br />DIVISION O F <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•$A FETY <br /> Bill Owens <br />Mr. Greg Lewicki ewernor <br />Gre Lewicki and Associates <br />g Greg E. Walther <br /> Execmive Dueaor <br />90$4 $. FOReSt Dr. <br /> <br />Highlands Ranch, CO 80126 Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />~ <br />RE: Ferrero pit (File M-2000-028) Results of Division review of applicant's March 21, 2000 adequacy response <br />Dear Mr. Lewicki: <br />The Division has conducted a review of your response to the initial adequacy review of the permit application for <br />the Ferrero Pit. The response, together with telephone contact by Keith Vanderhorst of the SEO, essentially <br />satisfies all adequacy issues previously identified by the Division. There is, however, one remaining adequacy <br />concern the Division requests you address. That concern is listed below: <br />REVISED PAGE 23: In the earlier adequacy review, the Division failed to note and, therefore, failed to <br />mention that the rates proposed for the seed mix are identified in the narrative line immediately above the species <br />listing as "rates for broadcast seeding:" while in the narrative line just below the species listing, the rates are <br />indicated to be "for drill seeding,". The revised Page 23 continues to carry this inconsistency. <br />Since the SCS recommendations for seeding rates N Appendix A are cleazly for drill seeding, the Division <br />requesu that a second revision of Page 23 be made in which reference to the proposed seed rates are consistently <br />identified as being applicable to seeding by means of a drill. <br />With submittal of a revised Page 23, all adequacy issues will be satisfied and approval of the application can be <br />made. With submittal of a Financial Warranty in the proposed amount of $13,887.00, in a form acceptable to the <br />Division, a permit for the Ferrero can be issued. <br />NOTE: If for some reason, you cannot respond by the April 7, 2000 decision date for this application, please <br />provide a written waiver of your right to a decision on that date in order that the permitting process be allowed to <br />continue. As indicated previously, approval of the application can not be given until all adequacy issues are <br />satisfactorily addressed. A permit will not be issued until the application is approved and the required Financial <br />Warranty accepted by the Division. <br />If you have any questions on the above, please contact me. <br />Sincerely, ~y <br />JCQTrtlf lC7t~~iu.a <br />James C. Stevens <br />Sr. Specialist <br />~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.