My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE115755
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE115755
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:11:43 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:17:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999120
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/22/2000
Doc Name
SLURRY WALL AND INTERIOR DIKE L G EVERIST INC FORT LUPTON SAND AND GRAVEL MINE FN M-99-120
From
DMG
To
ERICA CROSBY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Memo to Erica Crosby 3 March 22 2000 <br />Reservoir Filling <br />Past practices by the Division in permitting lined reservoirs included a requirement to provide bond <br />sufficient to purchase enough water from a reliable source to fill the reservoir one time. Numerous <br />gravel pits have been reclaimed or are proposed to be reclaimed as lined storage reservoirs since the <br />passage of Senate Bill 120 in 1989. It has become clear that there is a great demand for lined storage in <br />over appropriated basins and in particular the South Platte basin, so it is no longer a substantial concern <br />to the Division that lined reservoirs will not be tilled and ptn to their intended beneficial use. In the <br />worst case, virtually any reservoir could be filled eventually by using junior water rights in priority. <br />For these reasons, the Division will not require bonding to fill the reservoirs. However, the Division <br />will require a statement from [he applicant describing their plans for filling the reservoir. <br />Slurry Wall Costs <br />Slurry wall installation costs include geotechnical investigation and testing, design and quality control, <br />mobilization and setup, excavation of regolith, excavation of the bedrock key, delivery of bentonite and <br />water, mixing of slurry, mixing of soil/bentonite, backfilling of soil/bentonite, clean up and <br />demobilization, and testing and quality assurance. Specialized equipment is required to excavate deep <br />slurry trenches, and the cost of excavation increases dramatically for trenches deeper than 35 feet <br />and/or if the bedrock into which the slurry wall will key is hard or otherwise difficult to excavate. <br />Experience with slurry walls in Weld County and statements in the application indicate that the Ft. <br />Lupton Sand and Gravel Mine slurry wall costs will not be substantially increased by depth to bedrock <br />or by excessive difficulty excavating the key trench. <br />The following slurry wall cost references are illustrative: <br />• The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers installed slurry walls in an extensive levee improvement project <br />in the Pocket area near Sacramento, California. These slurry walls were 30 feet deep with a <br />reported unit installation cost of $5.00 per square foot. <br />• The Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable "Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix <br />and Reference Guide" reports slurry wall installation costs of between $5.00 and $7.00 per square <br />foot. <br />• Environmental Protection Agency document EPA 542-R-98-005, "Evaluation of Subsurface <br />Engineered Barriers at Waste Sites," August 1998 reports slurry wall installation costs of between <br />$5.00 and $15.00 per square foot. <br />The costs to install slurry walls at waste containment sites are higher than the costs to line clean water <br />reservoirs using a slurry wall. This is partially due to the need [o conduct chemical compatibility <br />testing and the higher degree of quality control used at waste containment sites. The applicant proposes <br />a $3.00 per sq. ft. unit cost For slurry wall installation, and based on review of recent bids for slurry <br />walls around gravel pits on the Front Range, this is believed to be appropriate. The slurry wall bond, <br />whether it is for installation around the entire reservoir perimeter or is a 20 percent contingency bond as <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.