My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE115749
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE115749
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:11:43 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:17:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
PR2 APPENDIX I CHANNEL DESIGN
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• management factor (C ); and 5) erosion control practive factor (P). In <br />comparing the approved and existing post mining topography the factors <br />R, K, C, and P will not change. The major difference between approved <br />and existing topography is seen as changes in slope length and gradient <br />(see Table 11). Therefore, reasonably conservative values were selected <br />for factors R, K, C, and P and these values were used in all <br />calculations of sediment loss. <br />Topographic factors were determined from measurements of slope <br />length and gradient scaled from topographic maps of approved and <br />existing topography. Calculations of soil loss for six major basins <br />within the Eckman Park Mine shows no change in soil loss for three <br />basins and a reduction in soil loss for three basins (see Maps 2 and 3 <br />of our previous report for basin locations). The reduction in soil loss <br />for basins 7-1 (Slw) and 7-2 (Slw) can be attributed to a reduction in <br />slope length. This has been accomplished by directing slope runoff into <br />drainage swales (effectively increasing drainage density) as opposed to <br />creating a featureless planar surface. The soil loss calculations, <br />therefore, indicate that an increase in drainage density may have the <br />beneficial effect of reducing soil erosion. The reduction in soil loss <br />for area 41 is due to a decrease in hillslope gradient. <br />In most cases the existing sediment yields are equal to or less than <br />sediment yields for the approved topography. For area 41 and basin <br />9/10-1 (51E) an increase in drainage area causes existing sediment yield <br />to exceed the approved sediment yield. Estimates of sediment yield <br />• (Soil Conservation Service, 1975) suggest soil loss rates of <br />approximately 2 to 5 tons/acre/year for the area of the Eckman Park <br />Mine. The above calculations of soil loss are at or slightly below the <br />low end of this range suggesting that the calculations are reasonable <br />for the mine areas. The total sediment yield of these basins is 937 <br />tons per year for the existing conditions as compared to 1020 tons per <br />year for the approved conditions; a reduction in sediment yield of <br />approximately 8 percent. <br />SUMMARY <br />The drawings enclosed herewith (Sheets 1-7) present a plan for <br />stabilization of the steep channel slopes at the Eckman Park Mine cited <br />in the August 8, 1986 NOV. <br />Use of riprap having a median diameter (D50) of 18 inches provides a <br />factor of safety against failure greater than 1.5 during the 10-year, <br />24-hour event for all locations considered. Although not specifically <br />addressed in this report, the proposed channel designs are based on the <br />assumption that only sound, durable rock will be utilized in <br />construction of riprap channel linings. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.