My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE115717
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE115717
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:11:41 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:14:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/28/2007
Doc Name
Reply Brief
From
Colorado Court of Appeals
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />I. Argument ...................................................................................................... 1 <br />A. Standard of Review ................................................................................. 1 <br />B. The District Court applied an erroneous standard of review to the <br /> record on appeal by requiring "some rational evidence supporting the <br /> Board's conclusion" instead of requiring "substantial evidence on the <br /> record as a whole" as mandated by § 24-4-106(7), C.R.S ..................... 2 <br />C. The District Court improperly affirmed the issuance of the <br /> reclamation permit based upon an erroneous interpretation of the term <br /> "affected land" that directly conflicts with the plain language of § 34- <br /> 32.5-103(1), C.R.S .................................................................................. 3 <br />D. The District Court improperly affirmed the issuance of a reclamation <br /> permit when the MLRB failed to require the Applicant to provide <br /> maps in compliance with §§ 34-32.5-112(3), C.R.S .............................. 6 <br />E. The District Court improperly affirmed the issuance of a reclamation <br /> permit despite the fact that the Applicant failed to prepare an adequate <br /> engineering evaluation to satisfy § 34-32.5-1 l5(4)(e), C.R.S ................ 10 <br />II. Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.