Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />I. Argument ...................................................................................................... 1 <br />A. Standard of Review ................................................................................. 1 <br />B. The District Court applied an erroneous standard of review to the <br /> record on appeal by requiring "some rational evidence supporting the <br /> Board's conclusion" instead of requiring "substantial evidence on the <br /> record as a whole" as mandated by § 24-4-106(7), C.R.S ..................... 2 <br />C. The District Court improperly affirmed the issuance of the <br /> reclamation permit based upon an erroneous interpretation of the term <br /> "affected land" that directly conflicts with the plain language of § 34- <br /> 32.5-103(1), C.R.S .................................................................................. 3 <br />D. The District Court improperly affirmed the issuance of a reclamation <br /> permit when the MLRB failed to require the Applicant to provide <br /> maps in compliance with §§ 34-32.5-112(3), C.R.S .............................. 6 <br />E. The District Court improperly affirmed the issuance of a reclamation <br /> permit despite the fact that the Applicant failed to prepare an adequate <br /> engineering evaluation to satisfy § 34-32.5-1 l5(4)(e), C.R.S ................ 10 <br />II. Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 12 <br />