My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE115685
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE115685
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:11:40 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:11:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/4/2007
Doc Name
Vegetation Inventory of the Danforth Project Report Dated January 1985
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 10 Item 5 -ST
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />A portion of the study area (approximately 170 acres) could not be <br />sampled due to weather and grazing prior to installing exclosures. The winter <br />of 83-84 was particularly harsh for northwestern Colorado. Snowfall reached <br />record levels and by spring, snowmelt caused severe flooding and landslides <br />in the study area. Roads were washed out or blocked by slides and access was <br />virtually impossible. Once road access was established exclosures were <br />installed. Grazing in the study area had been limited due to access, however <br />one week prior to installing exclosures grazing began in the mouth of West <br />Fork when 3D00 sheep were put into the area and herded up the hillside to the <br />north. It was decided that study site locations in the grazed area would be <br />abandoned and that new random locations be selected. <br />Not all vegetation types in the study area were sampled with the same <br />intensity. Ftajor vegetation types, (those whose area was greater than 5 <br />percent of the total proposed disturbance) were quantitatively sampled. Minor <br />vegetation types, (those whose area extent was less than five percent of the <br />total proposed disturbance) were sampled qualitatively as per agreement with <br />CMLRD (see letter Appendix A). <br />2.3.2 REFERENCE AREA SELECTION <br />Reference areas were selected according to the following criteria: 1) <br />the vegetation types were similar to those within the study area, 2) the <br />soils, slope, topography, and elevation of a vegetation type were similar to <br />those within the same vegetation type in the study area, 3) the dominant <br />species of a vegetation type were similar to those within the same vegetation <br />type in the study area, 4) the areas were potentially able to be controlled <br />by the Consolidation Coal Company and 5) surface disturbance was not <br />contemplated in the areas. <br />4 <br />Exhibit 10, Item 5 Revision Date: 03/06/07 <br />9 Revision No.: PR-02 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.