Laserfiche WebLink
2-11A <br />• T.% c~~ntirm thris approach, '_alt Creel:: Minima C.?mpany has performed <br />stability analyses of the larger cut. As in the case- ~?f the <br />refuse disposal area road, it was necessary tr. use assumed values <br />for soil parameters; therefore, the analyses must he considered <br />estiR~atas c~r~ly. Thee section analyze-d is at '3t atior~ 54+~7, Far <br />purpose of analysis, it was assumed that the cut w~?old be in soil <br />only, but any failure surface- would be limited by the- stiff <br />bi~undar'y. TY~e safety f3ct~~r was calculated to br 1.7'? for the <br />nperati~~nal pe-rind as compared with a safety factor of 1.~~~ far <br />original ground. These- re-salts c.?nfirm that the presc-nt de--sign <br />should provide stable slopes during the operational period and <br />after reclamation to AuC, <br />• No analyses were performed fc~r the cut at Station SO+pO, This cut <br />has been designed with 1.~Ii:1V slopes and will encounter roc4:: in <br />its upper pr,rtions, much the same as the- cut just described. In <br />addition, it is much sR~al lc-r, birth ire arc-al extent ar~d t~~tal <br />hoc-igh~t. It is therefore assumed that this cut will be at least as <br />stable as the cut analyzed. This slope will also be reclaimed t~? <br />Ai rr. <br />As described for the Mur~aer Haul road cuts, a prc~grart~ will be <br />instituted to monitor these slopes for any signs c.f instatility. <br />Th'iis m~~r~itc~r'ir~g pr~~grairi will aid in the design of ar~y remedial <br />me35Vl"e5 sh~}Vld they became ni:Ce s53r'y. It W111 31 Sii pray Lje data <br />• to refin•r the reclamation plan. <br />TFrese cuts will be revegetated as s~~an as practical after <br />5/8/85 <br />