My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE115166
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE115166
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:11:13 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 12:34:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
pages 7-1 to 7-49
Section_Exhibit Name
NH1 TAB 7 HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• where: <br />0 =flow (ft3 day-1) <br />K = Hydraulic conductivity (ft day_1) <br />2 <br />A = Cross sectional area of the aquifer perpendicular to the flow direction (ft ) <br />1 = Average hydraulic gradient of the aquifer (ft/ft) <br />The hydraulic conductivities (K) were calculated based on the saturated thicknesses <br />determined from the potentiometric maps (Exhibits 7-2 through 7-4 ). The following <br />assumptions were considered when determining K values for the overburden. Inf lorv (ground <br />water discharge) equals outflow (baseflow stream discharge). The ground water discharge <br />to streamflow occurs primarily in the upper portions of the overburden aquifer. Based on <br />lithol ogy the upper portions of the overburden aquifer have a higher transmissi vi ty than <br />the deeper portions of the aquifer. Consequently, tra nsmissi vity values have been <br />adjusted to account for the difference. <br /> Cross sectional areas for the three aquifers were calculated by multiplying the width of <br /> each unit normal to the flow direction by the mean saturated thickness of each respective <br /> unit (see Exhibits 7-2 through 7-4 ). The average hydraulic grad Tents ~we re determined at <br />• the vicinity of each cross section. <br />K = 3.7 ft/day (Overburden at Cross Section A) <br />K = 5.4 ft/day (Overburden at Cross Section B) <br />K = 5.4 ft/day (Overburden at Cross Section C) <br />K = 0.16 ft/day (Dakota Coal at Cross Section A and B) <br />K = 0.46 ft/day (Underburden) <br />I = .031 ft/ft (Overburden at Cross Section A) <br />I = .0342 ft/ft (Overburden at Cross Section B) <br />I = .043 ft/ft (Overburden at Cross Section C) <br />I = .0297 ft/ft (Dakota Coal at Cross Section A) <br />I = .043 ft/ft (Dakota Coal at Cross Section B) <br />I = .0301 ft/ft (Underburden) <br />A = 133,000 ft2 (Overburden at Cross Section A) <br />A = 253,500 ft2 (Overburden at Cross Section B) <br />• A = 40,000 ft2 (Overburden at Cross Section C) <br />7-15 Revised 04/11/BB <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.