My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE114868
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE114868
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:10:58 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 12:12:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981016
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
violations socioeconomics PAR review
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX XXIX Section XXIX.3 to Appendix XXXII
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• A secondary portion of this nnalysis was to determine the probable impact on <br />secondary employment of increased coal employment. Table II-7 presents the <br />determination of a Type II multiplier for coal employment. A Type II <br />multiplier is the impact on indirect and induced employment by increases in <br />direct employment. The data on Table II-7 contain an implicit assumption that <br />the coal industry is the only driving sector of the area's economy. There- <br />fore, all increases in employment in the area can be tied to coal employ- <br />ment. This nssumption yields a very liberal multiplier of 1.5 for the 1976- <br />1960 period. This means that for every one direct job, approximately 1.5 <br />indirect and induced jobs were created during this period. This is a liberal <br />estimate, since only changes in coal employment are counted as changes in <br />direct employment. <br />Further evidence for a multiplier of 1.5 is provided by the Department of <br />Housing and Urban Development and the Environmental Protection Agency in their <br />publications Rapid Growth from Energy Projects (1976) and the Action Handbook <br />(1978), respectively. Both documents suggest that a total multiplier of 1.5 <br />• during the operation phase of projects is reasonable. In addition, the <br />authors of the Utah Input-Output Study: Projections of Income, Employment, <br />Output and Revenue prepared by the Bureau of Economic and Business Research at <br />the University of Utah also suggest a Type iI multiplier of 1.5. <br />Therefore, in the remainder of this study it will be assumed that future <br />employment increases will be met by in-migrants and that a multiplier of 1.5 <br />will be used. <br />The next section discusses the status of municipal services by town to <br />determine the ability of towns to absorb growth. <br />D. Mun ici~al and County Services <br />The present condition of existing services are summarized in Table II-b. <br />Generally, every town is in need of improvement and/or expansion of a public <br />works project (water, sewer or streets). The condition of town services is <br />• not too surprising, given the historical agrarian belief that a town 'isn't to <br />live in, only to shop in." Another factor that confounds town services is the <br />lack of a county zoning ordinance; that is, if it is just as easy to purchase <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.