My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE114852
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE114852
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:10:57 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 12:10:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981016
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Geotechnical Investigation - gob site
From
Process Waste Disposal
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX A
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Western Slope Carbon, Inc. Page 14 <br />December 15, 1981 <br />I <br />-I ditches should empty into a sedimentation basin with a capacity of at least <br />4000 cubic feet, excluding a minimum one-foot freeboard above design spillway <br />I flow surface. The sedimentation basin embankment should be constructed in <br />accordance with the grading criteria presented above and should have an emer- <br />gency spillway which is protected from erosion by sack-Crete, rip-rap, or other <br />means. (For construction details on the diversion measures and ditches, refer <br />to Colorado Standard Plans, January, 1980, Standards Nos. M-107-A and M-203-C). <br />Upon completion of all fill activity in the Pit No. 6 area, a final diversion <br />structure should be constructed around the perimeter of the fill to carry sur- <br />face runoff away from the fill surface. It should be designed similar to the <br />temporary diversion ditches but, in addition, should be planted with erosion <br />resistant, water tolerant vegetation to reduce flow velocities, and prevent <br />erosion of the channel and reduce potential sediment generation. The final <br />] fill surface should be graded to drain to the diversion ditch and should be <br />no steeper than 20:1. The fill surface should be planted with erosion re- <br />f sistant vegetation. Under no circumstances should runoff from the fill surface <br />be directed over the waste retention embankment unless specific erosion pro- <br />~ tection, such as sack-Crete or rip-rap is provided. <br />LEACHATE GENERATION POTENTIAL AND CONTROL <br />Movement of the coal process waste leachate, if generated, outside of the Pit <br />No. 6 area, could result in contamination of groundwaters in the North Fork <br />] Gunnison River Valley. As such, leachate control or containment methods are <br />required at the disposal site. Since approximately 32,800 cubic yards of <br />l processed waste have already been placed in the Pit No. 6 area without a <br />1 leachate control system, movement of leachate out of the pit area is possible. <br />However, our boring in the coal process waste indicates that leachate has not <br />been generated to date. The waste arrives on-site in a moist, but unsaturated <br />condition. Thus, for leachate to be generated, the waste must first be sat- <br />urated either by direct precipitation and infiltration, or by groundwater which <br />J rises up into the fill. We consider the latter extremely unlikely for the <br />following reasons: <br />1. The site groundwater basin and proposed fill area are essentially <br />identical. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.