My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE114795
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE114795
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:10:54 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 12:06:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000113
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/6/2001
Doc Name
Public Notice
From
US Army Corps of Engineers
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,, <br />CESPK-CO-R <br />Page 3 Public Notice Number 200175036 <br />Mining areas A, B, C, D and E impact 10.73 acres of wetlands, 2.17 acres of aquatic habitat, <br />and 10.11 acres of drainage channels. The total impact to waters of the U.S. is 23.01 acres. <br />If Mining Areas F and G aze mined, an additional O.I S acre of wetlands would be impacted. <br />ALTERNATIVES: The applicant provided an alternatives analysis. These included the "no <br />action" or permit denial alternative and an alternative mining plan with additional acreage <br />being mined. Under the no action alternative, impacts to waters of the U.S_ from mining <br />would not occur and the land is assumed to remain under current agricultural uses for the <br />short term. The long term forecast for maintaining current uses appears bleak since <br />agricultural land use is no longer economically viable. Livestock grazing and use as a feed <br />lot would perpetuate existing impacts to wetlands including overgrazing, trampling, erosion, <br />siltation, excessive nutrient loading, and enhanced introduction of noxious vegetation. Under <br />the no action alternative, another local source of aggregate would be lost resulting in a <br />potential increase in building costs; there would be a loss of 20 jobs; and the local economy <br />would be adversely affected. Adverse impacts from mining to wildlife, air, visual aesthetics, <br />and noise levels would not occur. <br />The second alternative is the same as the proposed work, except that an additional 133.2 acres <br />of landscape would be mined on the large island (Mining Area H) in the Colorado River on <br />the northeast portion of the project site, and at areas F (Snyder Ranch) and G (Snyder <br />Ranch/Mamm Creek). A conveyor belt would be constructed to the island to bring the <br />aggregate across the river. Machinery would ford the river. As with the other mining azeas, <br />the Colorado River would also be protected by a 100-foot wide no-mining buffer. More <br />aggregate would be mined over a period of about ten years on the island, nine yeazs at mining <br />area G, and 1.5 years at area F. Greater exposure of ground water (113.22 acres) would <br />occur after mining ceased. Total impacts to waters of the U.S wouid be 29.68 acres (14.92 <br />acres of wetlands, 2.27 acres of aquatic habitat, and 12.49 acres of drainage channels). <br />Additional impacts to upland vegetation, agricultural grassland, and riparian forest and <br />shrubland would occur. Air pollution impacts will be the same as the applicant's proposed <br />action except the impacts would be extended for an additional 20 yeazs, the time required to <br />mine areas F, G and H. Impacts to wildlife would be greater. Visual aesthetics impacts <br />would be greater and extended due to the longer mining period. Jobs would be extended for <br />another 20 yeazs. Economic benefits to the local community would also be extended for an <br />additional 20 yeazs. <br />AREA DESCRIPTION: The project site is ranch land characterized by the Colorado River <br />and its numerous islands and alternative channels on the north, by river terraces of different <br />elevations on the south, and by two small, north-flowing tributaries which bisect the site. A <br />slough, fed by a.perennial spring west of the Snyder Ranch house and barns, flows west near <br />the south property boundary to join the Colorado River. Numerous irrigation ditches and <br />laterals bisect the river terraces to distribute water to introduced agricultural seedlings. The <br />project site ranges from a high of 5380 feet msl in the southeast to a low of 5320 feet msl in <br />the northwest. Predominant wildlife habitats consist of gazed pasture, irrigated hayfields, <br />wetlands and cottonwood riparian along the river. Pasture and riparian habitats are heavily <br />grazed by livestock. A communal rookery for great blue heron is located adjacent to the <br />Renewable Resource Area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.