My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE114643
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE114643
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:10:45 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 11:53:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/30/2007
Doc Name
Probable Hydrologic Consequences (Formerly Peabody Tab 7)
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(3) Attachment 2.05.6(3)-2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />monitoring show that impacts to the ground water aquifers are praci uding its use, Peabody <br />1 will provide alternate water sources of eaoparab7a quantity and quality. <br />Also discussed in Attachment 16-7 of Teb 16 are the 11 sur/eee water ri gh es the[ could ha <br />potontially affected Dy pit inflow drawdowns. An augmentattan plan, which uCilizea the <br />114 acre foot cansumpti ye use right Peabody has with the Htghl tna Canal, has been <br />dayel aped to mitigate the potential 26 acre foot Impact to outface hater rt ght users frmo <br />pit inflow drawdowna. The reader is referred to Attachment 16-1 to Tab 16 for a Wore <br />detailed description of the quantities o4 water to be augmented, the asaoeS eked <br />calculations and Me Dian. The inpacta to surface water users x111 De mS nimal and of <br />little significance, as an augmaniati on plan has boon developed that will insure Mat <br />Mose quanti tf as lost will be replaced. <br />Removal of Neils and Ponds by Ml nt no. No surface or ground water rights have been <br />identified within the Nucla permit reytsf on boundary for the Nuela East mining eras (refer <br />to Figure 2 oT Attachment 16-1 to Tab 76). Thus there will De no di tact impact from Ma <br />proposed mining plan on any local water-ri ghted facilities. <br />• Impact of Rapl acnd Spoi] Material on Cround Mater Ft ow and Reeharae Capacity. The pits <br />will remain open only until the coal has been renoyed. Following the short-term inpaets <br />(water level declines) on Che ground water ayatem as a raault of pumpage of ground water <br />i nflox to the p1ta, s potentf al long-term impact to the local ground water flow is Me <br />period of time necessary /er reaaturatS on of the spoil material and reestabiishoent pf a <br />f]ow gradient. <br />A wide range in permeabiltti es for spoil meters al can occur, depending on how it is <br />placed. Rahn (197fi) reported that spoil masers al .replaced using a dragli ne in one <br />instance and a aeraper in another, yielded hydraulic conducts vi ties of 35.3 ft/dsy and 0,4 <br />ft/day, respects yel y. Van Veast and Hedges (1975) concluded Mat greater porosities end <br />hydraulic eonduetiyi ties will result from yotume changes (approximately one-fourU <br />greater) between spoil material in its origi nel compacted, stratified state, end in its <br />rearranged state follontng reel acement, rcgardlesa of the method of pl aesment used. <br />Spoil material at the Nucla and Nucla Eaat ni ni ng ereaa wi 11 be replaced using aeyaral <br />tachnf ques. Same spoil aayemsnt at either mini nq area M11 ba accompli shad using cast <br />blasting. The remaining ni ni ng et Ma Nuela mi nS ng area will be conducted wtM aerapers <br />t7-27 Reyt sad 04/ll/aB <br />• <br />REVISED MARCH 2006 Attachment 2.05.6(3)-2-34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.