Laserfiche WebLink
Table 72 B, NMD Rechazge Time Estimate, provides the number of days it would take to fill th the additional <br />fracture volume resulting from subsiding the bedrock. Again, it should be recognized that this is a very <br />conservative estimate due to the character of the stream. The data presented assumes that sandstone bedrock can be <br />found for the entire length of Fish Creek overlying the panels and this is not the case. The section in which the <br />sandstone unit is exposed is the approximate 1260 feet of channel in section l0, TSN, R86W. The remainder of the <br />channel is alluvial material overlying the Lewis Shale. Given the nature of the shale it will swell to fill in any <br />cracks that may occur. The amount of time necessary to fill in the additional fracture volume varies from 0.6 days <br />to 17.4 days for panel 13 Right, depending upon the time of year mining and subsequent subsidence occurs. For <br />panel 14 Right the amount of time required to fill the fracture volume varies from 0.3 to 7.9 days, panel 15 Right <br />varies from 0.2 to 6.2 days, panel 16 Righ[ varies from 0.2 to 6.8 days. <br />Twentymile is the immediate downstream user of irrigation water and does not foresee any impacts to its <br />agricultural operations due to the potential loss of water form the system. th the event that significant losses <br />occurred during the irrigation season Twentymile has sufficient water rights to augment and loss. <br />th reference to water quality impacts, the ongoing downstream monitoring at station 900 on Foidel Creek does not <br />show any changes that can be attributed to subsidence over panels 8 and 9 Right. The reader is referred to TCC's <br />1996, 1997, and 1998 Annual Hydrology Reports to review this data. <br />Table 37A, Foidel Creek Flow Analysis after Subsidence in the EMD, shows that water is not being lost to <br />segments of the Foidel Creek that have been undermined and subsided ta the EMD. This is based on comparing site <br />800 plus ponds to site 900. The site 8 data is not being used in the comparison due the discrepancy in the data for <br />site 800 and Ponds B, D, E, F, and G. The total flow from site 800 plus the ponds should approximate the flow <br />recorded at site 8. TCC is investigating the discrepancy and will make changes to site 8 as needed. <br />• In order to validate that no impacts will be realized to the AVF located downstream of its operation, TCC will <br />continue to utilize its current downstream surface and alluvial water monitoring stations. These stations are <br />presented on Map I3A, Hydrologic Monitoring Program. The stations will be monitored as per the existing <br />monitoring schedule. These stations are located along Fish Creek th Section 5, TSN, R86W. In addition to the <br />current hydrologic monitoring program, TCC will initiate a program directed at the segment of Fish Creek to be <br />impacted by mining in the NMD. This environmental program is presented in Exhibit 4e-7, NMD- Fish Creek <br />AVF Monitoring Program. The program includes the following components: hydrologic monitoring, vegetation <br />monitoring, and subsidence surveying. <br />• <br />APp~~~~~ JUN 2 ~ 200 <br />PR 99-OS 2.06-25.4 l 1/17/99 <br />