Laserfiche WebLink
Chimney Rock Coal obtained approval to relocate a portion of the <br />• State Highway immediately adjacent to its surface pit at the <br />Martinez Strip, south of Pagosa Springs. The adjoining augering <br />activities, which were not projected to cause significant damage to <br />the pre-existing roadway, resulted in the complete disintegration <br />of the asphaltic road surface. Had the company somehow obtained <br />approval to retain the roadway in its original location, the <br />roadway would have required complete reconstruction, in any case. <br />In the event that the operator were to propose relocation of State <br />Highway No. 13 to an area previously undermined, a demonstration <br />would have to be completed to ensure the stability and safety of <br />the relocated highway. The applicant would have to demonstrate <br />that subsidence had ceased in the proposed roadway allignment, or <br />that the design would withstand projected movement. In any case <br />the relocation would have to be the subject of appropriate public <br />notice and public hearing. further, concurrence would have to be <br />obtained from the Colorado Highway Department, prior to approval <br />• from the Division. <br />In the event that the applicant were to resolve the prohibition, it <br />will then have to demonstrate that the undermining can be conducted <br />without subjecting the public to hazard. Hazards will be construed <br />not only as immediate injury on a disrupted roadway, but include <br />such indirect results as disruption of emergency services for fire, <br />ambulance and police coverage. The applicant will have to <br />demonstrate that these hazards can be mitigated during subsidence <br />occurrence and that the road can be adequately rehabilitated to <br />return it to the condition it would have been in had subsidence not <br />occurred. Further, concurrence would have to be obtained from the <br />Colorado Highway Department, prior to approval from the Division. <br />RESPONSE: See response to Description of Worst Possible <br />Consequences No. 3 above. <br /> <br />39-31 <br />