My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE114594
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE114594
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:10:41 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 11:50:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 39 PAR 10/17/86 RESPONSES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chimney Rock Coal obtained approval to relocate a portion of the <br />• State Highway immediately adjacent to its surface pit at the <br />Martinez Strip, south of Pagosa Springs. The adjoining augering <br />activities, which were not projected to cause significant damage to <br />the pre-existing roadway, resulted in the complete disintegration <br />of the asphaltic road surface. Had the company somehow obtained <br />approval to retain the roadway in its original location, the <br />roadway would have required complete reconstruction, in any case. <br />In the event that the operator were to propose relocation of State <br />Highway No. 13 to an area previously undermined, a demonstration <br />would have to be completed to ensure the stability and safety of <br />the relocated highway. The applicant would have to demonstrate <br />that subsidence had ceased in the proposed roadway allignment, or <br />that the design would withstand projected movement. In any case <br />the relocation would have to be the subject of appropriate public <br />notice and public hearing. further, concurrence would have to be <br />obtained from the Colorado Highway Department, prior to approval <br />• from the Division. <br />In the event that the applicant were to resolve the prohibition, it <br />will then have to demonstrate that the undermining can be conducted <br />without subjecting the public to hazard. Hazards will be construed <br />not only as immediate injury on a disrupted roadway, but include <br />such indirect results as disruption of emergency services for fire, <br />ambulance and police coverage. The applicant will have to <br />demonstrate that these hazards can be mitigated during subsidence <br />occurrence and that the road can be adequately rehabilitated to <br />return it to the condition it would have been in had subsidence not <br />occurred. Further, concurrence would have to be obtained from the <br />Colorado Highway Department, prior to approval from the Division. <br />RESPONSE: See response to Description of Worst Possible <br />Consequences No. 3 above. <br /> <br />39-31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.