Laserfiche WebLink
RESPONSE: Empire Energy Corporation will cooperate with making <br />• geophysical log information available to the CMLRD whenever <br />possible. <br />8. Outcrop Barriers page 2.05.3.7 <br />Any revision for daylighting will need to be a technical revision <br />due to subsidence and sediment control concerns. Such a submittal <br />would need approval prior to extracting coal closer than 100 feet <br />of the subcrop. <br />RESPONSE: Page 2,05.3-7 has been revised to address this issue, <br />9. Bonding <br />The Division has reviewed the bond cost summary submitted on <br />October 7, 1986. In general, the submittal is well organized, and <br />addresses the Division's requirements for supplying construction <br />specifications for structures. The unit costs seem conservative, <br />and are acceptable to the Division. THe most recent bond <br />calculation by the Division, which is dated May 23, 1986 and <br />utilized the Division's draft bond calculation handbook, indicated <br />that the bond is sufficient. <br />However, no costs were included to revegetate, if necessary, the <br />Utah Tract area. These fioures should be submitted. <br />RESPONSE: Exhibit 25, Reclamation Bond, pages i, ix, and 28, have <br />been revised to address this issue. <br /> <br />39-19 <br />