My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE114435
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE114435
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:10:33 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 11:37:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 30 SANTISTEVAN AVF STUDY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />C ~ <br />J <br /> <br />the flow is consumed into the deeperhvider <br />colluvial material and surface flow disappears. A <br />piezomcter (SCAW-5, Figure 1) was placed <br />belowthis step and exhibits approximately one foot <br />of water above the bedrock layer (Table 1). This <br />water is also observed at station SCAW-4 where <br />a similar sandstone step is located. Little or no <br />water was observed above or below these two <br />stations in the study area. All water level <br />readings from piezometers are presented in <br />Table 1. <br />Surface Water <br />Santistevan Canyon lies in the northwest <br />corner of the Golden Fagle Permit area and flows <br />south to the Purgatoire River. Tt is located just <br />downstream (1 mile) of the wnfluence of the <br />North Fork of the Purgatoire River and just 1000 <br />feet upstream of the confluence of Apache <br />Canyon. It is a dendritic type drainage with a <br />watershed of 2181 acres. <br />Surface water monitoring began on April 19, <br />1984 and continued through August 26, 1985. <br />Like Apache, Ciruela and other side canyons of <br />the Purgatoire River, surface flow is mainly <br />associated with storm events, at times creating <br />flash flood conditions. During dry periods, <br />surface flow is discontinuous along the length of <br />the canyon. There are three intermittent springs <br />which were monitored collectively at the flume in <br />the canyon. Flows originate from fractured <br />sandstones and shales outcrops. During the initial <br />monitoring period, flows at the flume ranged <br />between less than 1 and 50 gpm. Conductivity, a <br />measure of total dissolved solids and hence a <br />quality indicator, was between 493 and 563. <br />Values for pH were between 7.3 and 8.4. All <br />water quality data collected in the canyon is <br />presented in Appendix 2. Spring water is used <br />for livestock and wildlife watering and it also has <br />an aesthetic value as it runs through the ranchette <br />development in the canyon. Additional field <br />observations taken during January, February and <br />March, 1989 indicated that the canyon had no <br />surface Dow and was dry. Comparing the <br />monitoring period of 1984/1985 udth the first hat( <br />of 1959 indicates that 1989 has been a period of <br />lesser precipitation resulting in the no Dow <br />measurements taken at the flume site. In <br />addition, during the 1984/1985 period more <br />activity was noted at the houses and lodge (with <br />swimming pool) which may have provided an <br />additional supply of water to the drainage. All <br />water Dow data is presented in Appendix 2. <br />Soils <br />At each drill hole site a 72 inch pit was dug <br />with a backhce in order to gather soils data. Soil <br />profile data included soil type, texture, moisture, <br />rooting depth, and staining information. All soils <br />profile data is presented in Appendix 3. <br />Generally, the soil of the canyon is a loam with <br />varying fractions of silts and sands. Only one pit <br />(Pit No. 4) exhibited coarse gravely material <br />which is generally associated with alluvial deposits. <br />All of the other pits exhibited an A and C <br />horizon which was uniform throughout the pit. <br />As all of the pits and drill holes were dug on the <br />edge of the terraces, indication of water bearing <br />zones should have been encountered if present. <br />In addition, there was no evidence of <br />subirrigation, which is the delivery of water <br />upward from below the surface, far plant <br />consumption. Primary rooting depths were 0 to <br />40 inches and no evidence of soil staining and/or <br />mottling was apparent. The pits were backfllled <br />and reseeded following data collection. <br />Vegetation Data <br />Vegetation communities were identified in the <br />lower portion of the Canyon which could <br />potentially be affected by secondary or retreat <br />mining. Generally, the vegetation community is <br />a pine/grassland. The slopes are wvered by <br />ponderosa and pinon pine while the small terraces <br />in the canyon bottom are covered with blue <br />gramma and other native grasses and fortis. In <br />terms of wetland vegetation, a small area of less <br />than one-fourth acre exists in the area of the <br />identified spring and station SCAW-4 (Figure 1) <br />which contains sedges and rushes which can be <br />associated with a wetland situation. A small area <br />of willows also exist along the irrigation ditch <br />which crosses the lower canyon. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.