Laserfiche WebLink
~~C-\,p DEPAR~NT OF NATURAL RESOURCES • III'IIIIIIIIIIII III <br />..a~A ~\9Q D Mume Pisi oe E.xmwP Di:rcWr 999 <br />/I~ MINED LAND DECLAMATION DIVISION <br />~~~„ , .~. *, DAVID C. SHELTON Director <br />/ r ~. <br />.;na n] D Lamm <br />i.o.emor <br />Mr. Frank M. Graham, Jr. <br />Western Paving Construction Company <br />1400 West 64th Avenue <br />P.O. Box 21649 <br />Denver, Colorado 80221 <br />~~, i ~,` <br />Dear M1r.,~s-a-r,'-~m: <br />February 17, 1982 <br />.~i <br />i' • r ~ <br />.Ja~..,uet <br /> <br />Re: Broderick & Gibbons - "Fountain <br />Pit", Our File No. 81-307 <br />i have reviewed the responses to my adequacy letter of January 13, 1982, <br />and have a few more points of clarification. Z should also mention that Z <br />still need the proofs of publication and notification of adjacent landowners. <br />I will use my same exhibit letter and question number designations as in my <br />letter of January 13th. <br />Exhibit C <br />2. The new phases you have described on the new mining plan map seem more <br />realistic, considering the nature of the gravel deposit. Considering this fact <br />and the large size of the phases outlined, two points should be made very clear: <br />1) At any given time, no more than 60 acres t30 acres moderate and 30 acres <br />major) will be allowed to be disturbed under the terms of the permit. This <br />means that large areas of the phase must remain totally undisturbed or the <br />operator will be in violation. 2) The operator must remain within the phase <br />for which he is bonded and cannot follow the gravel deposit outside of that <br />phase, even if the disturbance is still within the permitted acreage. Any <br />change in phasing will require a revision to the permit. In general, my concern <br />is that this type of somewhat diffuse disturbance description mayae difficult For <br />the operator to maintain in the field. !lowever, keeping the factors mentioned <br />above in mind, Z feel that the sequence of disturt~ance that you have described <br />will be satisfactory. <br />3. Roads within the stages will be considered moderate disturbance on the <br />affected land and will be bonded as such. This should figure in when bond <br />(and disturbance) calculations are done. I presume that, since the operator <br />will use the existing access road along the utilities corridor, that permission <br />to use this corridor has been secured. In this regard, how much improvement <br />is to be done to this toad? <br />4. The operator should commit, in a general way, to using sediment control <br />methods, as necessary, to protect drainages during mining and reclamation. <br />Preciselocations of structures will not need to be shown, however. <br />Exhibits E and F <br />4. I need further clarification as to the use of sediment and drainage control <br />structures as a part of ongoing and final reclamation. Ate such structures to <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver. Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />