My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE114059
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE114059
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:10:13 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 11:16:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000144
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Section_Exhibit Name
ATTACHMENT A
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J <br />• • <br />ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. <br />Inc <br />Premiere Bulltling <br />825 Delaware Ave., Suite 500 <br />Longmont, CO 80501 <br />(303) 772-5282 <br />Metro (303) 665-6283 <br />FAX (303) 665-6959 <br />(first Initial, lost name)@long.rmcco.com <br />February 10, 2001 <br />Mr. Tom Schreiner <br />State of Colorado <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: Hall-Irwin Corporation North La Poudre Resource -Stability of the Sinclair Pipeline <br />File No. M-2000-144 <br />Dear Mr. Schreiner: <br />Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) was asked by Hall-Irwin Corporation to provide a design <br />for stabilization of the Sinclair pipeline lateral berm as requested by the Division of Minerals and <br />Geology (DMG) in a letter dated December 26, 2000 (Attachment A). The DMG letter specifically <br />required that a design be generated which would demonstrate and ensure equalization of <br />hydrostatic pressure between the two mining pods as it relates to the stability of the Sinclair <br />pipeline embankment. <br />RMC reviewed the Weld County FEMA Flood Maps and other available studies and determined <br />that the flow direction of the flood waters is generally from north to south in the project area, <br />immediately south of State Highway 392. Attachment B is a copy of the Weld County Flood <br />Insurance Map in the project area. <br />Two potential operational scenarios were evaluated for creating potentially erosive or destabilizing <br />conditions of the Sinclair pipeline. A description of each evaluated operational scenario, <br />conclusions drawn from the review of each scenario and design recommendations follow. <br />Scenario 1: West mining pod is full (or is not constructed) and the East pod is dewatered <br />Water flowing from north to south could spill from west to east into the empty east mining <br />pod eroding the toe of the mining slope and subsequently cause back-cutting of the <br />embankment. <br />RMC recommends that a soil embankment be constructed between the east and west pods <br />in a north-south orientation to prevent water from entering the east pod from the west. The <br />toe of this "erosion control embankment" should be constructed at least 10 feet west of the <br />proposed 3 horizontal to 1 vertical (slope stability Factor of Safety greater than 1.5) mining <br />excavation which parallels the Sinclair pipeline embankment. Refer Attachment C for <br />CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PLANNING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.