PERMFILE114002

• Permit No: M2001001
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 5/23/2001
• Doc Name: CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS APPLICATION
• Section_Exhibit Name: EXHIBIT C #3 05/23/01
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

MLRB Presentation Form
File No. M-2001-001
Line Camo Pit
April 4, 2001
April 9, 2001
April 10, 2001
April 10, 2001
April 10, 2001
May 5, 2001
Mav 10, 2001
Mav 15. 2001
Mav 17. 2001
Mav 23. 2001
• Page 4
Objection, David B. Wuchert, dated April 3, 2001. (17)
Objection, Leslie M. Sesler & Timothy D. Hovezak, dated April 5, 2001. (18)
Objection, Pete & Cheri Robinson, dated April 5, 2001 .
Objection, Marilyn Boynton, dated April 8, 2001.
Close of public comment period for Amendment issues.
Decision date (45 days from Amendmentl.
Notice of Formal Public Hearing published.
Pre-hearing Conference.
Notice of Formal Public Hearing published.
Formal Public Hearing (133b day of application).
ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED (as outlined in the Proposed Pre-hearing Order)
1. Have a!! appropriate agencies been notified of the application and have all comments
and/or recommendations been considered by the Division staff?
See staff response under issues 3 and 5 of DMG's Rationale for Approval Recommendation.
This issue was raised in objector letter numbers 1, 6, 9, 10, 15, 16 and 18.
(191
(201
2. Have all parties been adequate/y notified and wi// they be adequate/y notified in the future?
As noted above under INTRODUCTION and SUMMARY OF PUBLIC PROCESS, during the review
period, all public notices requirements were followed, and all public meetings and conferences
were held as provided in the Rules. See staff response under issue 6 of DMG's Rationale for
Approval Recommendation.
This issue was raised in objector letter number 2.
3. Has the agent for the applicant been candid and forthright?
See staff response under issue 4 of DMG's Rationale for Approval Recommendation.
This issue was raised in objector letter numbers 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18 and 19.