My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE113883
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE113883
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:10:04 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 11:05:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/2/1999
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 18 Characterization of Groundwater Sytems in the Vicinity of the WEM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayo and Associates, LC <br />• as 450 gpm, most springs have at one time or another gone completely dry. Seasonal <br />responses are demonstrated by box plots (Figure ] 0) that show the minimum and maximum <br />measured discharge rate for each lithology group are included in Figure ] 0. The box plots <br />indicate that the springs issuing from superficial sediments tend to have greater springtime <br />discharge rates and that all of the springs tend to dry up during the late summer and fall. The <br />box plot for Upper and Lower Coal Member springs does no[ appear to follow the trend of <br />decreasing discharge rates with decreasing stratigraphic position. However, this box plot, <br />which only represents three springs, is greatly skewed by one spring WCC-24. This spring, <br />which is a very unusual spring and is discussed below, has a maximum recorded discharge <br />rate of 108 gpm and a minimum discharge rate of 25 gpm. <br />Many of the hydrographs (Appendix C) for which long term data exist also show the effects <br />of climatic variability. Representative hydrographs are shown in Figure 1 l and the general <br />discharge characteristics ofsprings are described below. <br />5.1 Alluvial Springs <br />Adequate data only exist to construct one hydrograph (spring 26-1) for alluvial groundwater <br />systems (Figure l ] a). Spring 26-1 issues from alluvial sediments in the Deep Creek area. <br />Although the discharge data are limited as monitoring began in 1996, it is apparent that the <br />alluvial sediments are highly sensitive to seasonal variations. During August 1996, spring <br />26-1 dried up completely. During [he peak of the snow melt season in the following May, <br />the spring discharged nearly 30 gpm. This large variation suggests that 1) the capability of <br />• the alluvial sediments to transmit water is great, 2) the storage volume of the alluvial <br />Characterization of Groundwater Systems in the V~ciniry of the West Elk Mine, Somerset, Colorado <br />?9 January 1999 <br />Paee 58 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.