My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE113458
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE113458
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:09:36 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 10:40:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985129
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/30/1985
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO CONCERNS OF MLRD EXHIBIT D MINING PLAN
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />_~ <br />Applying the factor of $0.83 per cubic yard given us by Mr. <br />O'Connor, with a six inch topsoil cover, 815 cubic yards per acre is <br />required and yields the following: <br />$0.83 X 815 cu. yds. X SA. _ $3,382.25 <br />Basin Terraces <br />The footage of terraces required is unknown at this time. <br />The final grade of the reclaimed areas will not be greater than 47 <br />and therefore, basin terraces will be installed on an as-needed <br />basis to prevent erosion. It is estimated that no more than 2,000 <br />lineal feet will be required. <br />$0.35/Lin. Ft. X 2,000 = $ 700.00 <br />Mulching <br />$250.00/A. X 24A. _ $6,000.00 <br />TOTAL RECLAMATION COSTS $17,755.71 <br />Exhibit M - Local Government Approval <br />The Elbert County Planning Commission met on September 12, <br />1985 in a public hearing. The Planning Commission unanimously <br />approved the recommendation to the County Commissioners that the Use <br />by Special Review be granted. It is expected the County <br />Commissioners will accept the recommendation of the Planning <br />Commission in the public hearing to be held on September 27, 1985 at <br />11:30 a.m.. <br />Exhibit N - Other Permits <br />Applicant has discussed the matter of dust with the <br />representatives of the County Commissioners acting as the local <br />Department of Health under the statute. In addressing the matter of <br />dust control, applicants have agreed to apply a purlative on the <br />access road if required and to construct a dust box on the crusher <br />if required. It was noted before the Planning Commission when the <br />subject of dust was discussed that the material to be mined meets <br />the county standards for road materials and will not require <br />substantial processing to be used for its intended purpose. <br />OTHER <br />Tendered herewith is the publisher's affidavit requested. <br />- 3 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.